Andreas Antonopoulos @ MIT Bitcoin Club

If you start at the 23:40 mark, you will hear him answer the first question.  Yes, it's regarding anonymity.  No, he does not mention Darkcoin by name.  You can see that he wants to say Darkcoin...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8y_GypCWf4&feature=youtu.be

Post? What post? I didn't post anything.

Ahah that's true

Heheeeee
nearly got you there !
 

I've been thinking and reading some things, and another part of anonymity is having old unneeded tracks disappear. Is there anything in darkcoin that auto-prunes the blockchain of blocks that have no unspent coin in them? Or maybe superblocks every so often that collimate all the unspent coins into one block that then the history could be deleted? Anything like this in the works or already around?

Actually, I got the creepy feeling in this talk, that I haven't felt before, that Andreas was "speaking" the Bitcoin party line, not acknowledging how dangerous Bitcoin is, that they're not fungible, etc...  I mean just what Coinbase is doing with not accepting coins that have been through known gambling sites alone, is a failure point for Bitcoin, and Andreas glossed over that.

You're right, I felt like he did not say what he knew he should say, IMO.  Why is it? is what I wonder.  Has he sold his soul?  I'm a bit worried at this point.  Perhaps it was his audience?  Perhaps it was who paid for this talk?  

I just got a creepy feeling... he seemed conflicted.  g2g thought, so I don't know how the whole talk went...

I can't actually see the contents of the above post because I have Terzo2 on ignore however for the newcomers to this thread please note that Terzo2 is a bot.

you are being dumped ...haaard

when it goes under 0.01 then you can talk FUD rubish like that

but you and your idiot-like FUDers dont have enought Darkcoins to DUMP over that 0.01 step