i do 3d all day long, i have my own small business and can spend some time on these renderings.
Btw, it's pretty simple to setup such a pic:
the 3d safe was free: http://www.cgtrader.com/free-3d-models/architectural-interior/office-commercial/safe-3d-model
the mask was modelled in 2 minutes, the stopwatch was also free: http://archibase.co/download/4a2d9d06.html.
You just need to download the models, import them, texture and arange them in your scene, put some light in it and hit render. 1.5 hours in total, inclusive 20 min rendertime.

Is Etherium going to blow us away by allowing perfect anonymous crypto's to be hosted on their blockchain at the drop of a few lines of code ?

Is DRK going to be consigned to the anals of experimental history by Etherium ?

A programmable blockchain is of course very exciting for any programmer. But as I wrote in a prior post of your thread, Ethereum has a fundamental error in their design—every node in the consensus network recomputes the script to verify it. That is the antithesis of decentralization. They will need centralized censorship and a script whitelist, or a cap on script computation bandwidth. No peers can opt out of that computation, so the network computation bandwidth is limited to the weakest CPU peer. SNARKs technology is a potential solution, but it is not yet a realizable solution and may never be.

IMO, that is just dumb.

Vitalik has produced other dumb designs too (I guess we all have at one time or another). Originally Charles asked me before he started to work Vitalik about Vitalik's original whitepaper (before Ethereum) PoW algorithm and I blew holes in it, which have hence been publicly admitted by Vitalik. Vitalik is math smart (smarter than myself), but appears to be common sense dumb. Typical geek trade-off.

I had proposed months ago that a more decentralized solution for a programmable block chain is to let each script be an orthogonal merge mined block chain. So then consensus network peers can opt in and out. This also allows more competition on the design of the scripting language. The disadvantage is you just can't inject your script and have it run (need to convince peers to run it) unless that chain runs a scripting language that has a cap on script computation bandwidth (i.e. just like Ethereum with the advantage of competing merge mined block chains). In my proposal the computation cap could be specified per block chain, so only peers with sufficient CPU power would mine it. Thus weaker CPU power peers could mine chains with a lower computation cap.

I don't agree that Ethereum is doing very well. I think they will be an enormous bust and they are just expending a lot of zealot money while receiving nice salaries, capital gains,and having fun attending conferences and socializing. The fundamental issues were never solved.

zzzz, but no darkcoin payment option

Hello, I´m having problems with my home wallet, seems some funds have dissapeared suddenly, I can´t connect directly to wallet because I am at work and I´m a bit anxious because it.

The blockexplorer doesn´t reflect any recent transaction but the funds are gone.

Anyone knows what can be happened?

Regards.

By the way, I need to upgrade some of my wallets to 61000, is it -upgradewallet, or -walletupgrade?

who's OP?
Evan Duffield is the creator of darkcoin.
https://www.darkcoin.io/about/team-contact/

If the DRK is still shown at the correct address in the block explorer, they are by definition NOT gone.

Sounds like this 3rd party app you're using is either broken or you've made some mistake with it.