I've spent the last few days significantly reducing my position in DRK due to this statement by Evan:
As any of you in the USA smart enough to follow financial laws know, the IRS and SEC have made some rather interesting rulings regarding cryptocurrency. While I am no attorney (but make the habit of occasionally talking to one) I suspect there is going to be some... "Drama" in Darkcoin's future.
I have been making posts about the important need for, "Business Acumen" in the Darkcoin ranks. Before I buy back into Darkcoin in size, I now have the requirement that a very well-seasoned business executive that a venture capitalist would love be brought onto the Darkcoin team to make and handle business decisions. Note, this kind of person is going to likely require a large, vesting offering of Darkcoin for the trouble.
You are making this "drama" up from your ass
Please, go back to your farm
I wish that was true. Let's look at the IRS's guidance on virtual currency, shall we?
http://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/IRS-Virtual-Currency-GuidanceHow can Evan own something that is treated as property when I own billions of it as well? And if he doesn't really own it, how can he make a legal challenge that requires his ownership?
Maybe he can. Maybe Darkcoin has a team of amazing attorneys that understand cryptocurrency. All I know, is those 568 shares of Google I own don't allow me to make trademark claims on behalf of Google.
I SUSPECT that whoever owns 50.000000001% of Dashcoin is going to own the Dash financial trademark. But even then, it could be an ugly fight. Or maybe not. It's going to be interesting! Or maybe not. Heh.
