Young padawan, with all the modesty I have, I will say that you are living in denial


I took icopress with me last time I visited that harem, to initiate him. Now he says I'm just a peeper

Awww, well, I can not expose an odalisque, as I am a gentleman, but I hope that I proved, at least, that I am not a peeper 

She is a girl. Gazeta is CEO of that club.

One hundred and fiftieth week paid.

I had to bump up the flux capacitor for this one, and I'm sorry for the grave-digging, but I just wanted to say that even after recently encountering (and reading) through Blockchair documentation regarding this "meter"[1], I'm still unsure how is this percentage calculated and why it doesn't apply more weight to this characteristic that you pointed out at the time. If we take Foxpup most recent timely transaction[2] the only thing that appears to be stopping from getting 100 % as a score is because they supposedly identified matched addresses (We identified which of the recipient addresses possibly belong to one or more senders.[3]).

If we compare a transaction details which had a privacy-o-meter of 0 %[4] vs. the most recent one from Foxpup[5], the only heuristics that it's being applied to the transaction from Foxpup is "rare_fingerprint" - which is just described in their documentations as "This transaction has quite unique technical characteristics" - while the other transaction has at least 4 heuristics identified (amongst other properties) that are deemed to be more easy to track for blockchair.

What I can conclude regarding this exercise is that, like you initially said, they are missing some sort of heuristic to determine if a particular recipient address has been receiving a fixed amount of BTC from time to time no matter what sender is being responsible for the transfer - such behavior could be easily linked/spotted by someone who ended up investigating the receiver address... I reckon that these kind of tools, while may look good for outsiders, may give a false feeling of security in some cases (like this one). I wonder if this heuristic would be easy to implement?

PS: Sorry for using the flux capacitor in such ways. I promise I'll refrain from similar uses in the future ...

---

[1]https://blockchair.com/api/docs#link_M6
[2]https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/aff2ba4ade305580c0fe8638319424e2768fa0d0f595f48fe79338e2bfbbf4b3
[3]https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/privacy-o-meter/aff2ba4ade305580c0fe8638319424e2768fa0d0f595f48fe79338e2bfbbf4b3
[4]https://api.blockchair.com/bitcoin/dashboards/transaction/116bd19a3ec5f210ce72043115a4d5d3ef08f7556829c4feac8d89de3195ea4e?privacy-o-meter=true
[5]https://api.blockchair.com/bitcoin/dashboards/transaction/aff2ba4ade305580c0fe8638319424e2768fa0d0f595f48fe79338e2bfbbf4b3?privacy-o-meter=true

Thanks again for your perfect timing! I'm late again, as I had to put the kids in bed.

I was hoping that noboy will notice that I answered instead of you 

fillippone, amico mio, here you are! Let me serve you with my father in law's finest wine!



Yes, still in plastic bottle, but I evolved to 5l bottles, as you see   I just started it so please feel free to join me  

Of course, all gang members and wannabees are welcome as well icopress Juliya, are you here too?

 


My friend, I know you are drooling now. It's okay, I totally understand. My father in law's wine is best on Earth, I know. But I promise you that you'll taste it once. Don't live in denial, I know you are sad because you are not here with me now. I am sad too   But we'll have our chance! I can feel it!

Ahah LoL! I like this Carlo bloke on TikTok, I can relate to him. I do feel his struggle.
But apparently, breaking spaghetti is not so divisive.




I plead guilty on this.
Wine in plastic bottle. Not.