Admitting now I haven't read all 100 pages of this but if someone could clarify this would be great:
1) if I contact a charity who I think would benefit from the BTC and they agree to accept BTC donations and implement it, then I request here for the 1 BTC, since its already been implemented then the charity is invalid... or
2) since I have contacted the charity and convinced them to accept BTC they would be valid (provided all other preconditions are met).
There are many great charities I know and frankly would appreciate these funds that are sitting dormant...
but I want to be sure on whether its 1) or 2)... I am assuming 2) is the case.
2) is correct.
The issue we're running into is that Bitcoin100 was created to promote Bitcoin by convincing charities to begin accepting BTC denominated donations. Now, some charities are hearing about Bitcoin, implementing a method to receive BTC donations and then,
some time later coming to Bitcoin100 and saying, "We accept bitcoins." There is no hard and fast rule concerning how much time needs to elapse before an organization falls out of the running. We could easily give away the rest of the funds to NPOs that have jumped on the Bitcoin bandwagon but it defeats the original purpose of the Bitcoin100 - to promote Bitcoin.
Add to that the fact that we're all being pulled in multiple directions with other projects, and you get a backlog like we have now.