It is a fact, things are like that, for my part I always seek to have benefits through my own effort, whenever there is a bonus it has many conditions so for me that is not a very fair thing to say, personally I think that things it can be done without the need for bonuses, because if bonuses are taken and you want to withdraw some profit, you can't, so that is committing all the money to me, so that is not a business for me, I think that this bonus is for the people who He likes to play with a lot of patience and that is respected, but it's not my style.

I have seen that there are many players who publish that they can do a 5xc and even a 10x quickly, and I admire them because I know that above all what is needed is a lot of patience and a lot of perseverance, it may be that my impatience and my impatience play against me. the need to have quick results, but as in the game everything related to personality, style of play must be taken into consideration, they are different experiences.

Dont make me laught . you clearly getting paid by Rollbit (look at the avatar and signature) and talking about community ? You are joking ?
Beside i saw the representative answer its more like admitting to banning him and taking his funds just for betting on small odds.  Other bookies like stake simply they limit the bets by such users
But taking the funds is another level

You getting  paid by them so better shut up as you wont say anything against them for the pennies you get
 Lets real community discuss.

Again my question why Rollbit allow small odds if based on them betting on them is
ts abuse ? Why they simply dont remove them ? Or making it like a trap? Waiting a real answer not the signature beggars answer.

I am pretty sure it's going to end up being annoying for a while but they are going to stop eventually. Nobody could do this forever, or at least nobody should do this forever, makes no sense to keep on complaining and being annoying at a forum topic, people have better things to do, even these people do.

I remember clearly there was a guy who was against every casino and claimed he could sue them all, he annoyed everyone for years, then he got banned and now he is nowhere to be found. This is the same thing, we are not going to see these people here all the time, it's a phase and for a while they will be here but then slowly they will phase out and they will not be able to actually do anything that would hurt us or annoy us or trying to ruin reputation of solid casinos.

On online world, then we cant really be able to avoid such trolls on which neither they are really just having that personal intention on destroying some sites reputation or they had just been paid up or simply
this is some puppets of those competitors around, no one really knows! This is why its not really not having any sense on putting up some attention with these fellas.

As long there's no strong proof about issues been thrown or raised up then it would really be just simply be ignored but on the time that there's really that some sort of solid proofs then this is something
that would be needing to be clarified. As for Rollbit or any other casinos out there on which there are really these trolls who do keep on throwing issues but having none proofs
which it is really just that right on ignoring them and its true that they cant really do this forever. 

So you consider yourself from the actual community? When you woke up after years and start blaming casino based on any of the accusations against them so I think you should look for yourself without raising such comments on us.We are wearing signature for the advertisement but they have not involved themselves in any unethical business while there are many such fake claims so you should volunteer for them as well.

Your encounter with that person shows a key online issue: persistent trolls causing chaos. They are usually loud in their views, making baseless claims, like against casinos. Their fervor is short-lived, though. Considering why they do this is important. Some may believe in their cause, others aim to harm a site's reputation for personal benefit, or to boost competition. It's smart to disregard claims without strong evidence. Engaging with such claims only strengthens the trolls and gives their claims validity. We must avoid this.

This is the problem by those person which cannot accept that they are wrong since they will create scandal like this and get roasted because they are busted violating the rules of the casino. And for having that accusation it makes me wonder that if all of his claims against those casinos are legitimate or he just trolling since he just want to have fun with peoples emotions then see what is the reaction of people towards his claims posted.

I think it was long due from me. I was the one who suggested OP [stakemeharder] to create the flag. The way accusations are against Rollbit coming and their ignoring behavior about the accusations, are worrying.

Flag supported and I hope Rollbit is not using their reputation of running the signature campaign for long time and trying to get unethical benefit from it with creating doubt in forum members mind.

I appreciate your decision and for supporting the flag. I wish I could do the same, but unfortunately I still stand by the opinion that stakemeharder was not entirely not at fault here, nor does Rollbit. Both shared the blame. stakemeharder for utilizing a --probably-- value betting, though it's still unclear and they probably did that not on purpose, and Rollbit for not being ready to mitigate all potential risks when they offered promotion(s).

I even argued with myself since stakemeharder raised the flag and "complained" that no one supporting it about whether it's ethical to support the flag just for the sake of encouraging Razer to give something more in-depth like I did with tagging them on the other case. However, after taking this to the back of my brain for few days, I think that very act will cross the line of DT abuse if I did, because the clause of the flag dictate,


while I don't exactly affirming it to be --completely-- true to the best of my knowledge.

If I support the flag just to "encourage" Razer to give a reply and to make sure stakemeharder has exhausted all of the possible intermediary effort, that'll invalidate the support for the clause and I can be considered as abusing my DT power. Thus, I refrained from it until further prove provide itself... which it doesn't. LOL.

I think best I can do is to write on their thread informing them about this, and to ask them to perhaps consider giving more time to accumulate more support, if they wished so and not already had enough with the pace of this case.