More proof that Ukraine (really the CIA) started the war long before Russia invaded.


The CIA's Secret Ten Year War On Russia...From Within Ukraine!

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRqP4XLhqak
The New York Times came out with a bombshell article on Sunday detailing the past ten years of CIA active warfare from within Ukraine against Russia. From building 12 CIA bases within the country, to instructing on sabotage inside Russia to providing targeting intelligence BEFORE the 2022 Russian military operation in Ukraine. And...much of the operation was kept secret from then-President Trump!
...

---

Thanks, again for proving that you don't have a clue about what is going on. If you had watched the video in my post, you would have seen the proof - not just talk - that it was the US using Ukraine that started the war years before Putin decided to do something about it in 2022. However, I like the idea that you can dream. People should be able to dream. But try looking at reality some time.

Here's the video, again... just to make it easier for you to find - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRqP4XLhqak.

This is how propaganda works:
https://twitter.com/Xenta777/status/1761724381867257984
As of February 24, 2022: Ukraine had 250 airplanes and helicopters

By February 24, 2024: 839 airplanes and helicopters had been destroyed

About Macron words, I was surprised to hear it from him, you would expect to hear it from maybe Poland, Czechia or Baltics, but not from him. And seems that these ideas didn't got much support.
And I'm getting more and more sceptical about words of politicians about this war. C'mon, they failed to supply promised 1 million 155 mm shells and now they're talking about sending troops from NATO countries.

The thing is that at this point only works with those who make a conscious effort to believe the figures. In any war they tend to be inflated from both sides, however with the current OSINT available there are a few sites that have reasonably credible figures that at least can indicate the direction of travel.

I think that Macron wanted everyone to understand that the possibility actually exists. That a NATO member may perfectly well send either soldiers or other support personnel to Ukraine. It is just about opening the debate of what does EU want to do in the near and long future. The US as ally seems to be failing the moment a bunch of retards get hooked on Trumpamine and since that possibility exists, the common defence strategy may have to be fully revamped.




Seriously, facts?? In the first two minute this dude has already classed two newspapers as "part of the regime", then mentions an article that does not say what he says it says and goes to a tweet by a nobody repeating Kremlin propaganda.

do I really need to listen to ultra-biased shit when there is a clear fact that you are trying to ignore? Putin sent his troops and captured Crimea. This was a recognised part of a recognised country. That is the start of a war.

Whatever the CIA did or did not is no different to whatever the Ruzzian "inteligence" services tried and failed to do.

You guys speaking about facts in laughable (dumBAss).


[moderator's note: multiple posts have been merged]

I'd rather say that they don't like to be neglected. If you run a tank for 12 hours straight in difficult conditions without cleaning the air filter, you're neglecting it.

These tanks aren't made to be operated for so long, but rather mission-wise. It's range is up to 300km, so that's just a few hours of runtime without refueling. When you refuel, it's normal for the crew to do basic maintenance, clean visors and other equipment, clean or replace the filters. It barely takes 30 min, but some soldiers are given equipment they don't know and ride it until it dies.

Also, isn't this a machine made for desert warfare?
Still much better than Russian cans that grill the crew when they get hit.

Do you even think you are saying something important? Of course, all your rants - even those with a little truth in them - are fun for you, right? So, they ARE important to you, right? Almost everybody who contributes comments to the forum is having fun doing so, right? Or they wouldn't be here, right? And they aren't here, right? People enjoy your comments, one way or another.

All the lies of the US and Nato.


How Realistic Is Putin?

---

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/02/29/how-realistic-is-putin/
On February 27 I was interviewed by Finian Cunningham about this risk.  If the interview is posted online, I will link to it hopefully before it is taken down by the narrative controllers.

There is no doubt that I have been proven correct that the provocations, accepted by the Kremlin with only words in opposition, have increased in severity over the past two years.

First the West would send to the Ukrainians helmets and sleeping bags.  Then small arms ammunition. Then artillery.  Tanks were mentioned, but Washington and NATO said, "never tanks." Then tanks were sent. Then, after first being denied, drones and intermediate-range missiles. Then targeting information. Then mercenaries.  Then after being denied, now long-range missiles and US F-16s capable of penetrating deep into Russia herself far from the battlefront are under consideration.  And now the latest, the French President's proposal to send NATO troops.  "We will never send troops," declares NATO's Stoltenberg. But all the denials previously were breached and meant nothing.
...

---

Ukraine is spending all that help wisely:

https://newsyou.info/en/2024/02/prodazhi-elitnix-avto-v-ukra%D1%97ni-byut-rekordi

They will take exactly to where Ukraine has decided to be the best location to defend. e.g. try taking Robotyne and loose another 14 tanks + APCs or get pushed back to the exact position Ukraine wants you to be in Orlivka. Getting carried out into the "front collapse" narrative is easy after the "high" of getting another pile of rubble, but it is also quite dangerous.

Meanwhile is time to start talking about a disaster for the Ruzzian aviation. Another A-50 and two more SU fighter bomber. The free-ride to launch the gliding bombs is becoming more of a roulette game (I cannot avoid the pun: a Ruzzian Roulette game) and I so surprised that Ruzzis are actually letting the A-50 (this are those planes with a huge radar on-top like the AWACS) actually get in the danger zone. It smells of desperation.

The A-50s are soviet tek, the production lines are not there, the know how has been lost and the components will be nearly impossible to source. As said, buying Ukrainian agricultural land at Manhattan prices.

I read somehwere that after losing second A-50 plane, Russia didn't tried to use one of few their remaining planes near to Ukraine. So, it may be one of reasons why they lost so many fighter jets in such short time, sometimes even more than one jet per day. 13 fighter jets in 13 days in huge loses
Today I read interesting article with revealed details of Istanbul peace deal draft:
https://kyivindependent.com/wsj-russias-peace-terms-include-ukraine-outside-nato-limited-military-2022-document-shows/
Main points of it:
And then people are wondering why Ukraine didn't agreed with. Such conditions basically is capitulation of Ukraine and would end in similar and probably worse way than Budapest memorandum.