But then even if one is using public wifi it's still possible for the casino to detect whether or not those ips belong to same person using their browser histories but then not all gamblers enable cookies on the browser and that could hinder the casino greatly, but then if the casino discovered such prance like double registration, it becomes best to just request KYC from the player in other to avoid getting players punished just because there used public wifi to access the casino.
Ever consider device fingerprinting, rather than just IP addresses and browser histories, as a casino's Sherlock Holmes? Device fingerprinting is akin to a private investigator combing through the digital DNA of your gadget. It's like an invisible barcode, unique as a snowflake, transmitted each time your device taps into a website. We're talking the minutiae here, like the operating system, device type, the screen's resolution - the works!
This tech-sleuthing can allow casinos to spot repeat offenders, those sneakily registering multiple accounts from the same gadget, circumventing the ol' IP address and cookie restrictions. But this does paint a moral quandary: is device fingerprinting a necessary sentinel guarding fair play and responsible gambling, or does it leapfrog over the fences of privacy?