Losers vilify winners, and it's basic human instinct, not only this Bitcoin market, and not only happen with Michael Saylor.

I only feel so pity for people who don't want to join the party that is opened for them, and use as many chances as possible to attack successful people like Michael Saylor. He takes risk, he is determinant with his investment vision and plan, and most important he does not do anything wrong with other people who are outsiders of Bitcoin market.

If people saw the party but by their own reasons, ignored chance to join it, it's their responsibility for their failures, not because of Michael Saylor.

My personal opinion is that haters will always hate everything a successful individual gains. There is nothing wrong with what they are doing [Microstratergy] but the problem arises when there is a competitor involved to create a negative atmosphere. I am assuming that this is a phase that Michael Saylor has already faced when he was questioned previously about his intentions to buy Bitcoin he said it was for the greater cause of the community and all others.

He is doing what he sees best for him and his organization. He is one of the first entrepreneurs who believed in Bitcoin and now his beliefs made him one of the biggest holders of Bitcoin. Some had accumulated Bitcoin in the initial days, they are now the biggest competitors of his company as he won't be able to overthrow them with the quantity.

Maybe they are scared that he would have influence over the market. It is possible that people are concerned that if he successfully acquires a large amount of Bitcoin he would have influence thereby having the capacity to manipulate the market.

Others might be jealous of his success. The amount of Bitcoin Michael Saylor has acquired within a short period can attract haters.

Some people don't like him because he speculate Bitcoin price that doesn't seems achievable, he predict Bitcoin will reach $350K in the end of 2024.

Some people don't like him because he bought a lot of Bitcoin and he could manipulate the market.

I didn't see any more reason from holders to hate him, probably it's personal hate.

They're belong to no-coiners which mentioned by @OP, definitely people who don't hold Bitcoin are mostly against Bitcoin.

But seriuosly, did he mentioned that?
Last time I check, his prediction was only $100k by the end of the year, in fact theres a news that came out about that.

Michael Saylor Predicts Bitcoin Will Hit $100,000 by Year-End

I stand corrected on this one, my gosh.(poor comprehension. ) 

I think HODLers are paranoid of the day, Microstrategy may choose to sell high numbers of their bitcoins and even have a sense of censorship of the market based on how they are accumulating more bitcoins. But I think there are little to no worries in the long run for this based on this thread, When will Michael Saylor and MicroStrategy sell BTC?

If nobody talks about you, then you are nobody. When people are talking about your actions negatively because you are focused on achieving your goal, you should know that you are doing the right thing. Micheal Saylor has a plan in future on what he wants to use all the bitcoin he is buying to achieve, which is why people are criticizing him because they know that in future, he will outsmart all traditional investors with his bitcoin holdings, so they are jealous. This was how Bukele was also criticized by the media in 2021, when he started buying one bitcoin every day with DCA to keep as El Salvador bitcoin reserve. Enemies of progress are everywhere, unknown to you.

I think you nailed it - in some distant future, hate for Saylor would still be there, albeit it would be less of it and more because of people being jealous (even more than now), rather than thinking he is a madman or something.
I wouldn't be surprised if there would be whole campaigns to discrete him or his company for that matter.

I've posted numerous times in the bigger-than-big thread about MSTR and their BTC purchases (and Jesus, I didn't realize said thread was that old until I looked for it just now), and probably up until my last two posts or so I've kept a skeptical stance despite being lambasted by a certain outspoken member of the community.  I don't know why anybody here would vilify the company or Saylor per se, unless they see him as the equivalent of a bitcoin carnival barker.

That's the thing, though.  Michael Saylor might be hyping up bitcoin a little too much given that his company holds so much of it, and to that extent it might be questionable on his part to do so--but what I see mostly is a guy who truly believes in bitcoin and puts his money (or his company's at least) where his mouth is and views it as what it was intended to be from the get-go, a form of money.  He's definitely not just gambling on a moonshot and then a cash out like so many members here both past and present have done.

I mentioned in the big thread that MSTR shareholders might have a problem with Saylor should bitcoin cause the company to lose money, but at this point I'm thinking that if that hasn't happened yet it probably never will, especially since MSTR stockholders know (or should know) that the stock is nearly a proxy for owning bitcoin outright.

Eh.  Haters gonna hate.

People are scared over the growing dominance of Microstrategy into the cryptocurrency market. But I don't think anyone is bashing Michael Saylor personally. people are worried about too much of corporate cash flowing into the crypto market. Cryptocurrency should stay with the commoners like us. if corporates start buying into this market, it's just a matter of time they will gain the complete control of it. I believe that's what people are worried about.

A lot of corporates are sitting on a pile of cash which they can indeed invest into various assets. Microstrategy has shown the way and there's no guarantee that other corporates will not join the bandwagon. I am sure you wouldn't like corporates controlling the majority stake of the crypto market in future.