I see that possibility as pretty close to 0. I am more concerned that as it is diluting its voting power by issuing more shares to buy bitcoin, and already has less than 50%, in the future a decision could be made to sell by the majority of shareholders. But for the foreseeable future that possibility is also nil. No one invests in MSTR to screw up what is the key to its success.

In life generally, i have learnt on so many things, sometimes you could be doing the right things and people getting jealous of you because they are not up to the task of your capabilities, secondly, even if you're a good man, not everyone will like you or tend to accept your approach for no any reason, lastly, this is a public figure and we know Michael as well of Microstrategy, himself Michael would have be acting in some ways others feels good and ok with while some may not go well with some of his social media proclamations, but the good thing i have learnt from him is the perpetual holding capacity.

Michael Saylor and MSTR look liked a clown for those vilifying them because they've been buying at ridiculous prices for them. Not because it's too expensive for us, they shouldn't buy. But, they've got the balls in doing it while those that keeps on whining about their purchases have probably didn't bought any penny at all. They'll continue to do this but MSTR seems to be consistent at buying at the high prices that shall become one of the lows in the nearest future. They didn't know something, we also know what they know but they're putting where their mouth is.

You measure the support or lack of it towards someone by messages on telegram channels? That's cute.
For instance Russians use telegram channels to recruit spies in the EU and spread lies about the war. Does that make telegram a reliable source?

I'll bite though. Why don't people like Saylor?
He's rich for once and people feel the market is manipulated by rich people who can do what they want.
Also, most "crypto" Telegram users focus on shitcoins and Saylor is a bitcoin maxi.

This is what I think the reason why. I think it won't be good if others will follow microstrategy on accumulating more bitcoin. It would be problematic to other people who can only acquire small amount of bitcoin and as you have explained that they could have a full control of the market if this will happen. It will be hard for commoners like us when it happens when they have full control of the market although it's still possible but very hard and I think it will be costly.

I did not saw anyone criticizing MSTR besides those who think they are doing wrong to use their profits as leverage to take loans and then investing that loan back into BTC. I think you raise this issue in a topic and I came to know about it from your topic as well. And there are thos who criticize him for donating to devs to create more centralized products as in some videos shared by some OGz here, says, Micheal Saylor don't like decentralization don't know the reality.

But don't know the truth too so, I don't criticize him because his buying played an important role in pumping the price and he is holding onto a massive profit that he can book anytime and dump the market but he is using that profit to buy more even. That's a positive thing too but don't know why people really criticize him. Maybe just a sentiment that big brother in the house getting all the pie hehe.

Right? If a random small company do that, it might start their downfall if not managed carefully but this dude believe from the beginning he actually learned about the technology and do an all out for his money. And he is winning too since then.

I agree that people who hold cryptocurrencies for long time like us are ones who really support market. It is interesting that even though Michael Saylor is fully committed to buying and holding bitcoin some people still criticize him. It is surprising that people criticize someone who is actively helping and investing in bitcoin. We would think that community would support him because he is so dedicated. But instead some people focus on bad things or flaws they think he has other than recognizing good things he does for community. Instead of criticizing each other they should work together and be kind. If they do this they can create more positive and supportive community for everyone involved in cryptocurrencies.

I get to an extent why people don't like MicroStrategy. They think it is like FTX. They are also concerned that they are buying a lot of bitcoin that their intentions may not be pure. Like they will soon one day be confiscated by the US government and their bitcoin reserve which would then have a negative impact the adoption of bitcoin globally because by that time and with the rate at which they are buying bitcoin, they would have own more than half of the bitcoin in existence which will kind of make it easier to manipulate its price causing alot of panic among those who hold bitcoin. This is just what I am understanding from the who villification from people in the community. 

I think criticism of MicroStrategy's strategy should be allowed, without "vilifying" Saylor or describing his business model as a Ponzi or similar. For me it's a currently viable, but risky strategy. And I can imagine a lot of the criticism is rooted in these risks, be it due to fear that Bitcoin could be negatively affected, or simply to warn to be too bullish on his stocks.

First, it's true that we don't know Saylor's real intentions. There is no guarantee that his business model works for longer terms. We only know that he was able to sustain the model in a macro bullish Bitcoin uptrend with an intermediate 76% crash but a relatively fast recovery in 2023, where MicroStrategy didn't run out of money even if there were some rumours. But what if 2022 the price had dipped deeper? What if a very deep dip happens in 2026 because of whatever uncertainty that makes Bitcoin hodlers panic? And what if he simply sells eventually, e.g. when several Central Banks already have acquired some BTC, because he thinks that "the time is right to get out", e.g. because he thinks Bitcoin is close to an adoption/price ceiling? I think this all are scenarios which are possible.

Second, his buys are not really helping Bitcoin to stabilize. He tends to buy when the price is already high, so the cost is higher than a typical longer moving average or a DCA. This is also a bit logical, because he will be able to raise more funds when the market is bullish. But this way he amplifies bubbles without helping much to establish a bottom in bearish phases. And it makes his strategy also a whole bit riskier because there's a real chance that BTC falls for a longer time below the average cost which is currently already at 56000 according to BitcoinTreasuries.

I think it is not FUD nor vilifying to point out to these risks. In any case, I don't think that Bitcoin will be seriously harmed if MSTR fails. But it could lose some investor confidence, and a MSTR fail would for sure be very bearish for some time.