This is very important because not everyone can be trusted these days. A lawyer plus an important role to help in keeping will and making sure they’re shared as instructed by the deceased, then when it comes to bitcoin tht is very secretive and needs some passphrase or private key to be accessible in a wallet, you have to be more careful with the lawyer you’ll entrust such will to. Family members can also be a good choice to tell about it, but then, you wouldn’t want the will to be tempered when you’re still alive, so that makes it even difficult to entrust it to a family member especially the one you don’t trust fully in their ways.

I will still rather disclose it to a family member because in the end, they own the will. I could make sure they don’t get to have access to it until when I’m no more. It is very privacy conscious, so that can be handled with them as such as a lawyer can also do it. The main motive is that it gets to the hands of those rightful of it which there is no assurance through a lawyer but with a beneficiary family member of it, it could at least serve its purpose. I will chose a family member over a lawyer and that’s indisputable in my case.

Bitcoin doesn't need anyone to handle it for you. The security and its safety lie on you. You can choose or not to will it to anyone. Willing it to family relatives is optional, not compulsory. You don't need a lawyer for that; it is between you and the person you are trusting your seed phrase to. If he or she is worth trusting your seed phrase with.

In a case of a will, the beneficiary and the lawyer are both aware of the will. The lawyer alone won't know about the will, even though he might know the content of the will.
The same can be applied to Bitcoin, both the lawyer and the family member can know about the Bitcoin you hold. To make it safer, the seed phrases of the address can be stored in a place that will require both the lawyer and the family member to access in case of the death of the owner. Maybe sometime like a safe deposit box.

Bitcoin is very precious because of its high value in the present, which could even grow more in the future. So why would I'll entrust it to a lawyer which is not part of the family when I can teach my own family member about the high potentials of bitcoin, enough that it could create a big difference in someone's lives.

Bitcoin is totally different from fiat and those investment properties. We don't need to involved a stranger to keep and manage our bitcoin when we can entrust it to someone who is more capable and who can be more trusted when it comes to life-changing investments.

I would prefer to teach an immediate family member, preferably my sibling, rather than granting a lawyer access to my Bitcoin asset. Funny things happen these days, so one just needs to be careful., and Bitcoin is not like the fiat system where there are legal processes one would need to pass through to claim assets belonging to their loved one in the bank or so then why would it be so in a digital era when it is as easy as we could imagine to hand over assets to our loved ones without any third party interference etc.  Involving a lawyer is definitely the least thing I would think of doing. What the lawyer could do is to make sure my will is strictly adhered to as I have instructed.

People are bound to change, the lifestyle and decision of some people are not constant irrespective of who they are to you or the kind of profession the person has. Lawyers can change due to the desire to convert your wealth to theirs, even your most trusted family member can also betray your trust. situations have arise where trusting people that were meant to be trusted was the biggest mistake. But if a situation arise where I will have to chose who to trust, it would be my family members, it's better that a love one is in possession of the asset than a stranger who can vanish unnoticed.

It's easy as you said but passing Bitcoin as inheritance is really a big problem to me. Reason I said this is that, it is necessary you let your family know you have Bitcoin in your possession Incase of emergency or if death nock on your door, but if you decide to let your family member/ your spouse to have access to your holdings they may decide to move your fund while you are even alive. If you also entrust your seed to your lawyer, he may decide to withdraw your Bitcoin without your family knowing about it, especially after the owner is dead.

I would rather start a family, get married and entrust the money to next of kin.

Might sound traditional but it is the basic methods that humans have invented since a long time back to safeguard their assets by teaching the next of kin and handing over the baton.

Dont go forward in civilization just to go backward in reality. Lawyers have a different role indeed they may be needed in the process but trust is something is from the family not an outsider.

Having plans for accidents that might come in future and out of our control is very good because if we want our bitcoins to be inherited by anyone or any foundation or organization, we must prepare for it. Without any inheritance plan, if we suddenly pass away or any kind of accident that causes unconsciousness or unawareness or memory loss, our bitcoin will lose forever and no one can access it.

About solutions

I agree with you both, that I'd like to go first with my loved people and lawyer is my last choice if my favorite choice can not work like I have noone to give them that inheritance information about my wallets and backups.

Lawyers in theory have to obey a contract and law but they certainly can break the contract and law by doing illegal things. I can not trust lawyer and I would prioritize my loved people for this inheritance and sensitive information.

Why not let emergency fund be in fiat? Emergency fund is different from inheritance. There is nothing hard about inheritance. Go and learn about multisig as some people use it for inheritance purpose but in a way that it is only setup in a way only one person will not have full control. You can read about time lock also. Even a single signature wallet is enough if done correctly with a better approach.