I think Bitcoin can serve both purposes, but right now it makes more sense to see it as a long-term store of value rather than a currency for everyday purchases.
The comparison with gold isn't unreasonable. Bitcoin has a maximum supply of 21 million coins, and no central bank can simply decide to increase that limit. However, I wouldn't say it has all the advantages of gold either, mainly because its price is still extremely volatile.
As a payment method, Bitcoin definitely has its uses, especially for international transfers. The problem is that transaction fees and confirmation times can make smaller payments impractical, although solutions like the Lightning Network are helping address those limitations.
For me, the interesting part is the difference between what Bitcoin was originally designed to do and how people actually use it today. It started as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, but many people now treat it primarily as an asset to hold for the long term.
That said, I think Bitcoin still needs to demonstrate greater stability across different economic cycles before we can confidently call it an established store of value.
Do you guys think the Lightning Network could eventually make Bitcoin more practical for everyday payments, or will its future be mainly as a reserve asset?
