Your question op is too hypothetical, due to in reality everyone knows that Bitcoin is decentralized, which means that it can never become the stablecoins you are talking about.

That's why many whale investors invest in bitcoin due to they know that it cannot be controlled by all governments around the world.
Except in stablecoins as far as I know.

Though, this is just a question that wouldn't become reality because bitcoin will always remain volatile since, that's its nature. I love bitcoin and the maths code behind it which will make me hodli bitcoin till infinity. At least, I have full control over my money unlike, other traditional investment that is centralized.

It's those that are buying bitcoin for the sake of making profits that will see bitcoin as a bad market for them if the price is stable. Some investors are still holding their bunch of worthless shitcoins with the hope that a miracle can happen tomorrow for a price pump. Bitcoin is far valuable than those shitcoins. Some people are even holding USDT because it has more valuable than their local fiat currency.

If bitcoin had a fixed value with minimal volatility—like stablecoins—I’m not sure if i would switch over and sell all my bitcoin; it would depend on the staking and liquidity yields. If stablecoins offered higher rates, i would move my entire capital into them; conversely, if bitcoin continued to offer higher returns, i would go all-in on it. In any case, i would never give up on crypto, as it offers greater profit potential than fiat currency.

Dear, just suppose, ok? I give you two options here. One: keep holding your money in fiat in banks; second: hold your money safe aside in bitcoin, as it is a supposed stablecoin (which I know is not possible). In these two options, I can say that you will still choose Bitcoin if it is a stablecoin. The reason is that whatever money you are holding in fiat form is controlled by a third party, which means you don't have real access to your own money. But at the same time, holding your money in Bitcoin as a stablecoin, you still have the power of your funds in your hands without involving any third party.

Aside from this, there is no doubt that everyone invests in Bitcoin to make money in the long term. But we all have our own plans about holding Bitcoin. We all may have our own purpose for holding Bitcoin long term. But the common thing here is that everyone invests to make a profit. CMIIW!

I think the main question that i would ask you back is, is stablecoin backed by the same principle as bitcoin? Being fixed is not the issue but what is the principle backing it. So, yes I would still hold, but only if the reason it stays stable is the same principle Bitcoin runs on now. However, unlike stablecoins, bitcoin has no one in control and a supply that can’t be changed. This is what makes bitcoin uniquely different from the others.

One of the reasons why people are so interested in Bitcoin is its high volatility. If there were no rise and fall in its price, then perhaps many people would not be so attracted to it, but, if necessary, many people would accept Bitcoin because Bitcoin is not only used for price increase or decrease, but it is now used as a store of value. People can also use Bitcoin as a trusted medium for transactions. If Bitcoin were a stable coin, no one would use any other stable coin. Many people would accept Bitcoin for the convenience of keeping themselves anonymous. People would accept Bitcoin according to their needs and convenience. But why can't Bitcoin be a stable coin because its supply is limited. After 21 million, no new Bitcoins will come. Due to which the demand will continue to increase. The truth must be admitted that if Bitcoin did not have such high volatility, many would not have learned about Bitcoin so quickly.

Every country in the world has the power to block any website they want, whether casino sites or not. It's up to the players in that country to accept the blocking or find other ways to have fun.

I consider blocks, suspensions, and bans on these things to be like something from the Stone Age. They're senseless, illogical. There are countless online casinos; it's a business that has been very profitable for its owners, and we certainly have the right to choose where we want to play, but we should choose it ourselves, not have a government choose it for us.

If, for example, the price of BTC stabilizes like stablecoins, I will continue to hold BTC and continue buying BTC. If the price is stable, there's no harm in buying BTC. If the price is stable, the potential for a price drop will be difficult, indicating that many people are holding BTC.

However, I don't think BTC will be stable in the future because people certainly want to profit from buying BTC. However, I think BTC fluctuations may not be as high as they used to be. However, those who invest in BTC and hold it long-term will still profit, even if the price is high in the future, as BTC will certainly have the potential to continue to rise.

Op that is why Bitcoin is Bitcoin, the answer to your question is obvious no body will keep such a coin that it price is fixed and is static which is not moving forward but has a limit. That will be holding a Fiat currency in disguise as crypto currency and people will get discouraged over time when they find out that what they are holding is not going to appreciate in the nearest future. Growth in price is one property that has kept Bitcoin apart and unique from other crypto currencies which are out there. So the answer is no I will not hold onto such a technology that is designed in such a way.

This type of coins is bad for investment, because investors will not make much profit, even when left for a long time which will be a total waste of time and money because, the essence of any investment is for the purpose of profit generation and when once that is not guaranteed, it's purpose is defeated.