Wow, thanks damashup, is this something you developed? I see that this goes back a few months too. Good tool to research (if you have time) some of the background "marketing" behind a lot of coins including XMR, BBR, XDN etc 

Dust outs attached to fee. Finally this all fees joined together and transfered to miner in coinbase (this made to remove dust from uto), but this is soft ruke, default behaviour in wallet.

Zoiderg

Is the policy of dust same for XMR and BBR? What is the actual rule?

The actual rule is that when constructing outputs the amounts smaller than fee is supposed as dust. Also originally was more complicated algo for collecting outputs for new transaction, "select_transfers", that was also manualy included some dust outs into tx, but soon after release i changed this to better and simplier algo.

You better to take a look into tx_dust_policy and  digit_split_strategy in sources.

But may be i got you wront, can you clarify your situation with more details ? (may into pm, or here - up to you)

Zoidberg

I think this coin might be forked. Why is it that all the hashrate is at cncoin farm???

I tried looking for another pool but can't find any. Seems like they have like 110% of the hashrate right now.

SOmething isn't right here.

It's probably just variance as the nethash calculations are just based on the timing between blocks and are just an estimate.

I'm not so sure it's just variance. I wrote a script for monero that xnbya runs with some modifications here ( http://minexmr.com/pools.html ), and in my experience it's not sometimes, it is all the time that the sum of the known pools hashrates adds up to be 20-33% larger than the hashrate calculated from the diff. I think the diff is based on last 24 hours, and the pools base their hashrate on the diff of blocks over the last 10 or 30 minutes. Maybe I'm wrong, but if it was just variance in the hashrate, then at some point the calculated network hashrate would be higher than the sum of the pools (since this isn't even including unknown/private pools and solo miners), but in my experience this is never true - the sum of the known pools is always greater than the calculated network hashrate. I don't know why this would be, just an observation from monero that also seems to hold true for boolberry and bytecoin.

That seems reasonable. Maybe not anything malicious, but just a bug in the node pool software perhaps?

Yes i made a mistake. But I am surprised that everybody is on that one pool.

I keep getting disconnects from that pool and would switch but no other decent pool out there.