Smooth - if you've got time, a digest of the weeks commits would be great. Again, though, I feel the week timeframe is just too frequent. This is open source. Stuff happens in fits and bursts. Hell, even on github, there's a metric for "longest streak", so its a recognized phenomena that contributors get zoned in on a problem for days, and then might not touch it for a while. I don't know what a "team" for this effort could do - the questions would be "hey smooth, whats happening in this commit? And this one?" But if you mean someone to format something, then send you a document to answer the questions, and then its posted - then a team effort makes sense.


Also, a technical question:

I don't know if you've been following the stress tests in bitcoin:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1098263.220;topicseen

But one of the things that popped up was Elegius pool filtering the spam transactions. In general there's a camp that encouraged this mining behavior, but there were also plenty that were frightened by the "slippery slope" nature of this happening. I have more tact than to start bandying about the fact that in Monero you wouldn't be able to filter these transactions.. but could you? I don't know exactly what the spam filter was, but apparently the spam transactions were easily spotted by eye.... would spam filtering be possible in monero? There wouldn't be consistent addresses, so that method is out. There wouldn't be consistent output usage, so that method is out...

Deleted. We will work on trademark issue

Streisand Effect in 10...9...8...   

Hi all - just to formally state: we're aware of the trademark claims, and after consulting with the EFF we are now working with the Software Freedom Law Center to figure out how best to deal with it. Please be aware that it is a slow process we have to work through, and there isn't much we can state publicly, until we are told otherwise by the attorneys. We will keep everyone updated as and when we are able to:)

Edit: any who have received trademark complaints, who don't need to stay pseudonymous, and want to work with us on this, please email us: dev@getmonero.org

I just sent the Moneero bizdev guy a warning email too :p

Donated 10 XMR to Moneromooo for http://moneroaddress.org/

This is great work!

Edit: Will also donate ~50+ to the Monezor project soon. Hope roosmaa is feeling better.

Not entirely clear to me: you're saying the reputation damage is on Monero side?
If so, I found that hilarious. The "moneero" company (who btw after raising private equity by issuing shares in 2013 - I almost bought some - apparently completely failed and went on a total pivot of their service. It was not called moneero by then) is the only one who has reputation to lose, if they believed to have any in the first place.
It will blow up in their face in terms of public image, and I'll be happy to let them know through private channels. Let's also let them know through public channels (twitter, reddit...).

I don't think there's much value in us speculating when fluffy already posted the possible clarification that matters right now.

Here's that recent example at ArsTechnica that came to mind:
IMAX apologizes to Ars for its trademark retraction demand

Note: The context in this IMAX piece is completely unrelated from the case here with Moneero/Monero, just pointing out that I totally agree with Binaryfate with concerns to public image and reputation damage. 

Yeah my point is I'm not competent to judge the legal side but the public image angle is something that might well backlash into this company. Additionally to attacking a FOSS project, there are many Bitcoin early adopters that are somehow involved in Monero, and it's not like the Bitcoin ecosystem is so huge that the moneero company could not care about what the "community" think of them.

It not against me, it was against "Monero" trademark a half year ago.