2. Whether the I2P+ring is secure against the global police state.
Even if you are correct that limited transactions would allow #1 to scale, it doesn't diminish the fact that #2 is not secure against the global police state.
Who really needs to be secure against "global police state", must have full-anon internet connection anyway.
Everyone who has large wealth that they don't want confiscated by the bankrupted western socialism.
Agreed it requires some way to fully anonymize our interaction with the crypto-currency, but if you are implying that every aspect of the internet must be anonymous, then I disagree.
For example, some may wish to use the fully anonymous crypto-currency with mostly offline activities, so only their interaction with the coin's network needs to be protected. There are many other online scenarios as well.
Monero alone doesnt have to be 100000% secure against any theoretical risk. Who needs this security level,...
Snowden's revelations means it is not theoretical. Also I provided documentation that the G20 are actively ramping up their plans.
Again, "Everyone who has large wealth that they don't want confiscated by the bankrupted western socialism".
...most combine different techniques and systems (anyway).
Dont act like a privacy coin must include its own anonymity network as new network layer.
I know of no set of techniques for mining and or transacting on a crypto-currency that is nearly
always anonymous to the NSA, except perhaps using an
unregistered connection to the internet (which can't scale for most).