It does if you want the certainty you want. Well as one wit said "history doesn't repeat but it does rhyme".
But I'm still trying to understand what you are saying. Are you saying this happens to the entire world or just to the USA or just to some places?

If you are saying the entire world then you have a very difficult case to make if you are using history as your guide and if it's just the USA then...m'eh.

If the US empire collapses that is hardly the end for the rest of the world, and may even be good for America.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Fall-Empire-Development-Environment/dp/8230004927

Yes. Mixing is never the solution for anonymity.

Anonymous coins with mixer are total scam.

The design goal of I2P integration isn't to solve the "perfect anonymity" problem. It is purely to obfuscate a single node's traffic so that an attacker with complete control over that node's Internet router has no clue whether Monero is running or not. To that end, using something like I2P is advantageous (over using our own obfuscation such as RC4 (like Skype) or DNS tunnelling) as it means an attacker is at best able to determine that I2P is running, not what I2P is doing.

Of course, someone like the NSA may have methods of remotely accessing RAM of a running system, which means they can access unencrypted data in-RAM. They could also have all sorts of arcane tools and exotic hardware for breaking various encryption algorithms. No amount of cleverness from our side is going to fix that.

With rare exception, every state on the planet grows larger, more tyranical, more confiscatory, and more dangerous with each passing year. I get that they aren’t a huge threat to people like yourselves right now. The point is just that if this trend continues, and there is no clear reason to expect that it wont, than they will become a threat to everyone at some point in the future. Whether something changes this trend or how far away this is i don’t know. What i do know is that if this trend doesn’t reverse, than everyone will be in danger at some point in the future and i dont think it behoves us to operate under the assumption that this threat is far off in the future.

I understand perfectly well what you've written, you seem to have misunderstood what I have written.

First, stop talking about Tor, we've never mentioned Tor and have already rejected it due to the problems inherent in their use of exit nodes.

Now: we are not aiming to prevent a global adversary who has control of all bordergates at all ISPs on the planet from making assertions and observations. We are aiming to prevent them from knowing whether Monero is running or not. They can know I2P is running, that we don't care about, but they should not be able to determine whether the person is harmlessly browsing the web or using Monero without completely decrypting the traffic.

Why? Because a wannabe "global police state" (without resorting to the exotic methods I described) cannot possibly go after millions or billions of people around the world under the control of regimes and governments of all sorts merely for using a communications system.

I understand that you're a terribly clever and opinionated chap, but don't assume that we are ignorant or that we have made decisions for no good reason. I2P integration is for a specific purpose and is fully expected to be a stopgap if its shortcomings are not solved over time.

Yea you know i may be unfairly looking at the world through the lens of my own perspective. My government (that is to say the government that rules over me not the government that i own ) started out small and has grown out of control over the last 200 years. However most other governments were much more tyrannical 200 years ago than they are today.

Not true at all, i am curious where you heard that 

Yep, the Monero team is just a bunch of hackers. In fact, the way they do things, the prospects are dark for this coin.

I agree that XMR team are hackers which are very competent in coding and managing the network. It is great for XMR future. Not sure why you think that "the prospects are dark for this coin"   I believe that you find "the prospects are bright for DRK" because DRK supporters are bunch of liars