i had same issue with curecoin wallet

Who knows what will actually happen, but the price of bitcoin is certainly dictated more by the value of the US dollar, rather than anything the Chinese are doing. The Chinese are obviously behind most of the global hash rate, and that obviously has a knock on affect on price - but the US dollar is still the global yardstick that determines the relative value of most cryto. And most other globally traded commodities. Even if that cause is simply a secondary affect of fiscal policy and market sentiment.

 If you look at the amount TRADED though, the Chinese makets dominate Bitcoin trade by a VERY wide margin.

forbid CO² tax this energy waste would be the proper way

there are ways to secure a chain without waste insane energy as NEM with POI and after POW->advancedPOS switch ETH too show

Been a while since I last updated everyone, CureCoin is still chugging along as always

The new security technology I've alluded to earlier will be releasing in late January as a public beta, along with a public beta of cc2.0 using it. Timeline after that depends on community feedback and how stable everything is. More announcements to come soon, sorry everything is so under-wraps.

Maybe the release of CC2.0 would also be The occasion to put a more "professional" or appealing logo on CC2.0?

This wouldn't require too much work for Curecoin Team, and now you have a webmaster (Mr. Clavijo). For example:

1) ask the community designers to propose their designs before January 31,
2) discard all non-serious proposals
3) display on a page on curecoin.info the candidate logos with a different Curecoin payment address under each one
4) give one week to people to vote by doing a Curecoin payment to the address that corresponds to the logo they prefer
5) the winner logo is the one that cumulates the highest amount
6) donate all the received payments to a charity

 

I was expecting some remark like that and that's why I added the step 5... so if a rich guy is willing to pay a lot he would at least help a charity

You can also say 1CURE/vote but it would be quite a lot of work to check that a rich guy didn't create a lot of addresses.

And there might of course be the debate about whether a guy who owns only 5 CURE should have as much weight in the decision as Ed Olkkola... In business it's the number of shares that gives the power of decision...


 
 

In my opinion there should be no difference in treatment between miners and folders as Curecoin 1.0 wouldn't exist without SHA256 miners. If they are only 5, good for them: they share the 20% of daily coins. But did they hold or dump their coins?

In the same way there should be no difference between folders and those who just invested their $$$ in buying CURE and thus raising its value.

So probably a vote system based on "shares" i.e. how much CURE one owns would be the fairest from a business point of view. This is the system that FLDC had (VOTE tokens) but if I remember well, they used it to ask more risky questions than which new logo

Indeed! Life is unfair sometimes. But if you sell your shares whatever you do with the money, you lose your decision power.


According to the very first post by Vorksholk in this thread:

Curecoins go to three main areas: Folders, Miners, and Developers. The folders get 76% of the total coins (80% of the coins distributed per day). SHA256 miners get 19% of the total coins (20% of the coins distributed per day). 2% of the total funds are distributed to people who donated to project development. The other 3% is dedicated to Curecoin developers, and will be used for paying for development costs (such as hiring professional programmers, paying for infrastructure, etc.), and for giving back to the community (folding hardware giveaways, faucets, covering 0% mining pools, etc.).