Well don't trust CURECOIN with your money if you like it....


don't get burned. So many lost money on this shitshow and now they have to seek a cure for their depression.

Despite the good 'idea', too many fundamentals are not present. You are 'folding' for a bitch that get it for free. Miners dumps at every occasion, or hold in despair. Large hand pump to make some FOMO bagholders  thats don't even read past the coin nickname, just to dump harder. No big fish will buy something that the 'consumer' dont need to buy WITH MONEY.

Who are you folding for already?

Get a reality check CURECOIN.

Well let's just start with Folding Curecoin,

1 - Who is using the folding.
2 - Do they(Answer #1) need to purchase Curecoin on a exchange or from an individual to be able to use the Folding process('folded' from miners, with an electricity/hardware cost) for 'the proteins answer' they are looking for?


I'll try to illustrate the issue without your answer first ;

Big miner 'A1' decide to mine curecoin for a good cause.
Big Miner 'A1' receive 1 000 000 Curecoin for his folding effort, but need to pay X1 electricity bills, and Z1 Hardware investement cost.
Big Pharma 'B1' need the result of 1 000 000  Curecoin effort. Big Pharma Never heard of Curecoin, and receive the result for free just for listing a project for a curecoin miner to fold on.
Big Pharma 'B1' make 1 billions USD for this cancer cure that they were looking for , and will sell it a high price to your dying mom/heritage.
Big Miner 'A1' hold 1 000 000 curecoin, but no one except speculator wants it.
Curecoin life circle is only Mine -> sell to support mining expanse ; at miners dumping price

What it should be really be if this project had logic fundamentals;

Big pharma A1 buy curecoin to fold more or less quickly for their project/problem -> Miners gets paid to fold it for them -> sell to support mining expanse ; at Project value/competitive levels.

THERES MORE THAN BITCOIN MARKET CAP SITTING IN BIG PHARMA AND THERE YOU ARE GIVING AWAY YOUR FOLDING POWER FOR FREE TO THEM TO SELL BACK THE CURE TO YOU OR YOUR RELATIVE.

' Are miners holding or dumping? You can't have both. '

What about just like ETH, LTC, XRP, BTC? (how many of those coins did you mine? How many do you hold? Ask yourself.  How many curecoin folders hold curecoin? How many non-curecoin folders hold curecoin? Ask yourself again. Oops?)

Mining and holding because the value will go up, because bank, corporate, private USAGE/CONSUMPTION will  move up with time? AND dumping because actually someone WANT TO USE OR HOLD IT EVEN LONGER?

So yeah we can have both, useless the coin is missing Fundamentals.

'If you're buying Curecoin for profit, maybe we're not the best choice.'

So with the same hardware power I can just mine DCR and expect some profit? And with curecoin I should forget the idea of ROI??

As for the net-positive social benifits? Will the cure I found would be available to me or a PAY WALL WILL BE SET AND LET ME AND MY FAMILLY DYING of that VERY SAME CURE?

What curecoin needs is get the top 10 bigpharma fight for the folding power they need to find a cure they can sell.

Thats it. No more no less.
Not happening?

Curecoin =  

 Reality check - there are HUNDREDS of folks doing folding on Team Curecoin, not "less than 20"

 There are something like 20 of us AMONG THE TOP 50 "24 HOUR AVERAGE" FOLDERS ALONE as a general rule.

 http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/individual_list.php?s=&srt=1


 IMO CureCoin would be better off if we could get the Gates foundation interested in buying CureCoin (and probably FoldingCoin as well), as both would promote getting more hardware pointed at a proven "find new drugs to cure/treat diseases" project which would be at least somewhat in line with the stated objectives of that particular foundation.

 "Big Pharma" isn't who's backing Standford's F@H efforts.

No one, much less the whole community, needs to spend that much time trying to convince an exchange to stay a delisting. The fact that they are delisting a "cause coin" is, in fact, representative of the fact that they have already made up their mind and pages of a forum thread aren't going to matter

Several people have volunteered to help out with Curecoin.  Feel free to connect with us at http://slack.curecoin.net:30000 Thanks!

I think that what Rikim says isn't total nonsense...

Curecoin has been created way after F@H to offer some financial reward for folders. The Devs have reached their goal as we will soon be #1 Folding Team and some of the very big folders that have joined the team did it after the CURE/FLDC significant price increases last year and this year.

But the main problem is that folders work for a University (Stanford) who's main (if not only) aim (as for all research teams around the world) is to publish some papers in famous scientific magazines (Science, Nature...). So don't expect Stanford to change their "business" model. They will continue to have a few PHD students setting up a few projects with the aim to publish papers, not trying to raise CURE and FLDC value.

And this is a pity because taking into account the HUGE number of GPUs that are mining useless altcoins all around the World, having a smarter "business" model involving CURE/FLDC could bring many of those miners into Folding and therefore increase the folding power by a factor of several tens or hundreds.

But Stanford prefers wasting time on crap like bringing Android smartphones to Folding. They obviously didn't realize that a bunch of 1080TI's working 24/7 will do more work than ALL the Android clients working from time to time...

So maybe one idea would be to find a bunch of researchers and create a "competing" Folding research lab that would be in tight contact with Big Pharma and do the folding according to Big Pharma needs not with the only aim to publish papers. And of course have Big Pharma pay with CURE/FLDC the research done. Big Pharma money would heavily increase CURE/FLDC value and tons of miners would join the Folding Team. That would lead to more research, more health results and more money for Folders...