When will the update?

Out of altruism or profitability?
I see that recent surge in CURE price was short-lived, so just wondering.

No, that's what got me to post here.
SOGassets says I have cards X, Y, and Z; however, Counterwallet shows no such thing (hence the need for going to SOGassets to see the cards to begin with)

Same here, sadly.
But ZEC is still more profitable than merged folding ATM, so hence my confusion.
I guess you have more faith in CURE in the long run?

 Actually, for the average of my cards, it's a LOT optimistic on the sols (370-390 for most of my cards even with optimised but still reliable overclocks, a couple of the high-clock Gigabytes hit a hair over 400) even without factoring in the rather high NiceHash fees, and a little optimistic on the PPD (most work units 560-600 kPPD range) as I don't push my 1070s all that hard on folding due to the higher power consumption and temperatures.

 My current figuring with CURE at 6000 satoshi (yeah, it dropped back under that right now but will probably spike again) and the usual $1.30-$1.40 a day they're getting out of NiceHash and NOT figuring FLDC (the bloody fees getting that stuff OUT of the Counterparty crap eat a LOT of that profitability) make CURE pretty much a tossup with ZEC right now for my 1070 rigs.

 Add in the FLDC and they're definitely more profitable with CURE at 5000 (which it's VERY close to even after the fallback today).


 My small group of Maxwell cards (3 x 960, 2 x 950) are still doing other stuff - even ETH is more profitable on them.


 Unless VEGA takes a huge step forward on folding vs anything previous in the AMD line, I'll probably never fold on AMD cards - they're almost more profitable to do GridCoin via MooWrapper (among other BOINC options) with than to Fold with.

I could see one of those cancer awareness groups like the big ones for breast c. endorsing and using Curecoin for some kind of fund raising reward.  Blockchain may become mainstream if there is enough positive political change, which is long overdue.  

1080 is greater, sure, but it also costs $800 CAD vs. $550 CAD for a 1070. Pretty sure there's almost no situation where it's 45% faster.

It might make sense for someone who has the money up front and plans on keeping them for a long time, or if you were building many many rigs and wanted to get more PPD per slot to save on motherboards/HDDs/CPUs, etc... but in my case it doesn't make sense at all. Actually even in that case even just getting one 1060 instead of a 1080 or two 1070s instead of two 1080s would be enough to pay for the rest of the rig. They are too cost prohibitive.

Power is included in my rent here anyway so I'm not too concerned about that. Even if I were it's Canada and most of the time it's cold and the more heat my hardware gives off the less the baseboards are running anyway.

I just want bang for buck for my hardware. 1080s are one of the worst things I could buy for that metric...but I'm not buying right now anyway. If I were to build a folding rig right now I would want 1060s, 1070s, or possibly (used) Fury cards. For any other type of rig I would want 470s/480s or more used Hawaii cards (or again maybe Furys).

@bardacuda
I'm too lazy to explain to you the math behind why 1060s aren't even an option for a full rig, or how ROI works, or why (at the time of this posting) there isn't a 10xx card under $1,000p/card that beats a 1080 (even with free electric).
I wish you the best in whatever your choice is.

Your math is way off and I'm not sure how greater ROI would give you "buyer's remorse", but I wish you all the happiness one can muster in your endeavors.