Sure, Malta is waiting for some incompetent one man band who cannot even launch one product within 2 years.

Any future blockchain gaming payment solution is likely to be based on ETH.  It has all the necessary features, including a sub-minute block time, and it can easily incorporate all the features of the Prypto closed loop system, which never took off.

Face it, CSC is dead.  

I sold my coins to the poster who offered 5 BTC for them a few posts above. The trade went through on Alcurex.  I was subsequently able to sell a further 100k on Cryptopia to some hopeful but misguided bidders.

Already made 20% gains after reinvesting them in Factom and ETH.

You can waste your time waiting for anything to happen in CSC (hint: never) or make money in the ongoing race for which coin will become the next BTC.  

I hope to start working on the C++ code tree again in the coming months, ... i have the following on my wish list:

• Separating core (lib), CLI and Qt wallet source code into different projects
• Implementing reverse blockchain download using checkpoints to speed up initial wallet sync for new users
• Re-evaluate possible diff options as i am convinced that there must be a better algorithm than the current one
• Looking at adding some Insight server items straight into the CSC daemon and rebuild the Insight API on top off the C++ daemon instead of its own NodeJS implementation

Are there any other items the community would like to see added?

I am currently also working on some examples on pushing gambling results onto the blockchain, .... kind of adding a 'Proof of Gambling Result' feature. That could potentially increase  the need for an increase in block size in the future so yes i guess we need to consider the possibilities. I guess that Litecoin is a good proof of concept for that and we can look on adding that in the future. On the other hand looking at the diff and getting the blocktime closer to its projected 30 seconds would already give CSC the possibility to process 20x more transactions as BTC.

There is also an other thing that has been on my mind lately, .... the Qt license conditions keep changing and move towards commercial applications more and more. Professionally i already switched to Code::Blocks and wxWidgets because of that and i really started to appreciate that IDE.

So i might consider migrating from Qt to Code::Blocks when i separate the source code into Core, CLI and GUI projects. Currently nobody else does development on the C++ source code but would there be any objections against that?

I guess i then would also create a 'Lite' and 'Pro' version of the GUI Wallet where the lite version would only support basic send/receive/addressbook options and the pro version would include all current features but also more mining and blockchain info, .... kind of adding the insight like search features into the wallet pro version. Because of legal issues we will never add gambling directly into the wallet but if all the above is achieved we could also create a desktop casino application that connects directly to the blockchain quite easily and creating some white label applications might give CSC a real push!

I think that would push CSC into an 'illegal usage only' direction ..... i think the legal casino business is actually struggling with KYC and AML requirements. That is also the reason of my 'Proof of Gambling Result' comments. If we can show the business that CSC can actually help them solving KYC and AML we have a business case.

Man you moved onto bigger bubbles, I see massive pain for ETH holders, FCT is not even a block chain.

So that's why I am chiming in CSC is the casino coin, but not in the way you suspect.

CSC needs to become a general promoter of casino projects that have ROI.

It primary function is just being a surviving block chain, that's the main value.

It can build value by being a social or public platform for finding casino projects.

Specifically spinning out tokens.

No objections from me, I trust in your development skills and wish I had a better grasp of c++ so I could help you.

Some good news in the altcoin world - https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/03/coinbase-adds-support-for-litecoin/

On a side note as of yesterday I have finished re-integrating roulette (thoroughly upgraded) and poker into the cscgaming platform, next ill be creating the blackjack/baccarat and then the slot machines.

I think it would be a really good idea to consider moving to POS after updating the codebase to as close to litecoin as possible. Then breaking up the things you wish to put into other projects.

Logically, overall, i believe this to be less of a headache then what you propose. I'm more then willing to be incorrect though.

We all know what is Prypto and who is behind, don't we? The percentage of chief executives of multitrillion dollar companies on this forum is well over 0.5% and this tells you a lot. You can spot them rapidly if you look at their manner of typing and their posting habits, many if not most of them are lurkers and operate silently but everyone knows they all are part of Prypto.

Does bittrex still do the bribe thing to get coins listed? If so, anyone wanna pitch in to get it listed?

They state that they might add a coin for free but can charge up to 3BTC for investigation of the coin: https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/202583854-Submitting-a-Coin-to-Bittrex
If necessary i am willing to be the Enhanced Verified Account member needed to register and i am willing to donate 0.1 BTC towards the good cause ....