I do agree that it would be nice to roll out a new "brand" of the coin. It would attract a lot more people to the coin and would get rid of the crap in its past.
I'd have to disagree. Earlier in this thread the name was discussed extensively,
and the conclusion is that it is the principal asset of this coin. In any case, any name change
ought to have been done in the start of the first takeover. Getting rid of it now would give
a signal of weakness, whereas preserving it will be a show of resiliency.
If a coin can survive a failure of one takeover that is a sign that it will probably be around
for a long time. Keep up the good work.