Thanks for the input on sig changes, I edited my post to include the color orange by default. Red looks good too in my opinion, but ultimately you guys can just edit "orange" to whatever you'd like.

Yes, I remember you posted in the Wall of Shame.

Why cannot I come here and talk about fair distribution? I was considering investing in this restoration and, of course, I was interested, if investing, in it having fair distribution for I consider it it's only chance of survival. Why can't I, according to you?

I have a ton of ideas, a ton, that will make this coin a success. But neither Jarvis nor the rest of the miners want to hear them because... well because it will imply NO MINING WHATSOEVER, to start with. So what would even be the point?

The price is neither ridiculous nor anything else, it just is. And the ONLY value of a coin is that which is set by the willingness of someone to pay for it. Nothing else whatsoever.

I have implicitly made proposals already: That website? gone. A liability. The June 20th date, gone, too hasty. The distribution? scratch it and start again.
I have a ton more. But that's not what any of the people posting on this board is interested in hearing. So I pack my marvels and go. Fair enough?

Well I  - a non-miner - at least read with interest your posting,
although I feel not entirely qualified to comment. But if you
have indeed more ideas I'm sure they will get the attention
they deserve.

What I think is that a culture should be built around the
theme of the coin, Honor. And some specific usages associated
with that theme. Otherwise the salvaging operation is really kind
of pointless feat.

I believe in FACTS, nothing else. So let's state few simple facts:


Still, like I posted, I believe this coin could be a success easily. But it requires much wider distribution. Much, much wider. With reach to the entire crypto community. Jarvis -and you the scammed miners- clearly don't want that. You prefer to hoard a huge stack of worthless coins rather than a much smaller % of much more valuable -potentially- property. Hey, it is a choice. Your choice.

And it is wrong and will fail.

I have no comment to say about this but you are mostly right about it.

If the dev team and the community is willing to be long investors not just DUMP their coins after the original dev scam, then it will be a waste of time.

BUT, also the community and the dev need a time to build this, only time will tell what's going to happen.

Not all of those who want to help with this coin are the miners who got fraud, for a humble example, many others and me.

I sold my coins during 2k - 2.5k region before the scam and made a good profit, the coin is cheap now, so it can be a great chance to invest and make a great profit with it.



I try not to talk about scam coins outside of the Wall of Shame, where some of the reasons for BC "success" are taken to task. If Organized crime with all their resources, takes over tomorrow Honorcoin, I can assure you they will pump it up enough to make huge profits for themselves... it doesn't seem to be the case, is it?

Organized crime? sounds like you are repeating that so called IcoinicExpert words, though he never proved a single word of what he said when many asked him to prove it.

I can't remember an " organized " crime team was willing to show their physical faces in a weekly video broadcasting, unless maybe you can give some examples?

There are companies and organizations such as CoinKite, Wall Street Journal and many other are not willing to sacrifice their reputation for an organized crime (as you are saying), and whenever they want to cooperate with a team like BC team, they will investigate them well before shaking their hands with them.

Beside all SCAM coins are rising with their prices temporary and then fall down, I guess we never sat a scam coin ever that went from 500sat to 25k sat and stayed there with some price fluctuation although the coin had been and still being attacked by scammers, haters, frauds and some whales.

Seriously you didn't find any role model to repeat his words but IcoinicExpert who took the donations of his (Wall-Street) initiative fraud and never returned its funds to those who asked to refund it cause their donations had not been applied for the stated target of the donation?



But the only reason for the success of blackcoin was, precisely, the community, the huge size of a devoted community. Yes it got to 90k strictly due to the efforts of IconicExpert, not because the dev team did anything right. IE did. Since he went out, the coin has been lagging badly and just the pump and dump actions of La Mano Nera keeps it going.

FYI, IcoinicExpert wasn't a well known person during the 90k days. he became well known JUST after his wall-street initiative, and of course to persuade some good guys with good intentions to support BC and some of them were too naive, he claimed that he was the reason behind BC rising to 90K, of course to give a reason about why people shall send them their money, which was nothing but a fraud from his side.

As long as IcoincExpert is a reason for bringing up a coin, i wonder why we never saw him showing his " talents " with making another coin rising or did we?





Maybe his talents after all were nothing but an " organized crime "

write all your ideas, no body can ignore new ideas.

Miners who want to dump their coins are free to dumb anyway, the community want the long investors.

Then I will give you these simple facts: I repeat this one: The SOLE reason BC went to 95k was the fforst of IconicExpert. All of them itemized profusely in many threads but mostly in the original -now closed but readily available- one.

For four or five days, IconicExpert quadrupled the value of LibertyCoin before the scam dev decided to destroy it when IE was pushed to take over. It has since lost 90%+ of it's value.

Currently he is promoting CLOAK. Take a look at what that one's doing.

I included IconicExpert in the Wall of Shame because he said he would give to charity the donations for his Wall Street project instead of returning them to the donors. I believe that is wrong and therefore I have included him in the Wall of Shame. That doesn't mean what he has accomplished is even open for debate when it is, was and will be,  so easily demonstrated.

Those are clear, specific facts.

Regarding BC I have talked enough about that scam. Coinkite is a very stupid idea that will never work and open to anything, really, including BC, and the Wall Street Journal is not in any way, shape or form connected with BC. If you want to ignore the Black Hand operation on the inside of BC (admitted in the public forums), then you are NOT really interested in facts.

barabbas. you are like a leach who connects itself to the host an dsucks the blood from it. why don't you fuck off and destroy some other coin. bc is obviously not a scam. it's the one coin that is growing slowly and strongly,price is'nrt everything.that will come with time. thuis coin was a scam but the community has decided to make something of it and not roll over and be conned yet again. now piss off and give us a chance. we don't want your poison here troll boy

Yeh, I assumed the risk for a project, i m ready to see the coin down but not to lose the money because u change the project. We can be more " honorable " than previous dev . The total amount is going to double: the half could be free distribution. Because you mean of another project from scratch, but this is not the case. Maybe u like the name of the coin and u would like to build something of new but then we are talking about something else, no? I m ready to talk about that, but in this specific case u have to compound your ideas with the other interest. Maybe you dumped the coin but here there are persons that didn't it and I think they deserve respect. Also that is HONOR

The good ol BC IE talk..