Honorcoin is dead 
Development team hurry 
Bittrex and Poloniex exchanges hurry 

I think still waiting bittrex, wallet is disabled there

Ah ok, thanks for the info.

Any idea if the devs need any additional funding after Bittrex is ready for the update? Is there a public donation address where we can donate XHC and BTC towards development?

Love the replies "Honor is dead"... Are you a mosquito? You live only a month, than die, yourself... The coin is only a few weeks old on the exchange. Hell, your account is only a few weeks old on the forums. Stop attempting to inform people who have been here for years, of what is "dead". You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. (If you are on a new alt account, thus the few posts and newb status, then your guidance has no merit. You hid for a reason... More than likely a bunch of other wrong calls.)

Again, there is no point announcing that the coin is dead, unless it is some pitiful attempt to get more cheap. If it is dead, as you say, then go away, it's dead. Why do you have an interest in a dead coin? (Because you actually believe that FUD works, and FUD actually has nothing to do with anything. Might be why you keep finding yourself investing in the wrong coins, because you listen to FUD and HYPE, and think it actually dictates the market. You couldn't be further from the reality of things. FUD and HYPE controls YOU, not those who make money. Those are the ones playing off FUD and HYPE that you follow. Unfortunately, if you don't have finances to play the FUD and HYPE, you just look like an idiot crying wolf.)

P.S. Found more servers that we might have at our disposal, if only for more nodes. I didn't realize there was a strong private tech-world in Jacksonville, Florida. Who knew!

I totally agree. Your words are much appreciated. It makes me feel good believing that this coin still has a heartbeat and others still believe in its potential. Thank you again for the much appreciated occasional shout-out. Peace!

Jarvis is looking for some BTC support, if someone thinks they can contribute a few dollars for some of the adding-up expenses... It WOULD be greatly appreciated. You can PM him for some details of the things he is looking for support with, or visit the IRC chat (Listed on the first post), and send him a message there.

He is not asking for us to PAY for all expenses, just asking for some kind assistance with SOME of the expenses. Mine, are currently being used to help sustain the coins lows from going lower, until we are ready for launch. This, in addition to the personal funds I am spending on hardware. There is only so much that we can do as individuals.

Don't be afraid to ask what your funding is going to be funding. Where possible, when the time comes, all my expenses will be itemized, for the record, but not for reimbursement. Just so that we all have a solid understanding of the solid value of XHC as a whole. That is the best way to measure the growth of the network, as we expand.

Yup, it's a scam, you saved us.  

Glad that was finally picked-up by someone.  

Where would we be without your guidance?

Funny that you keep making an appearance. No sense telling us it's a scam, we are the ones who were scammed. But, I guess you have not picked-up on the fact that the scam was identified two-weeks into the coin. The point when we (the community) took it over.

Wait, are you calling US the scammers? (Again, point lost on us, as we are the ones buying it and supporting it, and taking it over.)

Since it is an obvious scam... Then sell. I am buying. Oh, that's right, so are you. Why are you investing in a scam? If you are not investing or selling, then what is your point. Do you have turrets syndrome? Is your medication not working?

You still don't grasp the fact that preaching to the choir has no effect. We went-over the changes, which are not going into effect until the wallet has been accepted by both the exchanges, and then released. Thank-you for reminding us that the website needs to have the same reflections as the thread. However, since you are the first to point it out... Obviously, it has not been visited since the original suggested outline. It has only been a few days since the changes have been made, and the winner of the contest was selected. We do have jobs in the real world to ALSO tend to. Please be a little more compassionate towards our efforts. (However, I assume you have not invested a dime. That, or you hope to only invest a dime, to make a quick dollar from it.)

Are you the original dev? Is that why you are so mad? Sorry that you dumped, and now the price is about to rise. Let me share my deepest sympathy for you.  

Too tired to keep replying. Though it was fun the first few times.

P.S. Thank-you for the donation. (Not you...) I don't want to mention the persons name without permission, but I did want to let (the community) know that a generous donation was put forth towards some of the cost of the takeover. I have let Jarvis know of the donor, and suggested that a record, of some form, should be published of all donors, where they wish to be identified. (Though, donors can remain anonymous.) To date, that was 0.15 BTC which has been donated. (BTC is preferred, as donations of XHC would have to be cashed-out, at the moment, which would lower the value.)

P.P.S. You can also donate directly to the community, by simply purchasing some XHC. Preferably above the asking price, but below asking price does actually help too. Even if it is a cold-gesture simply showing interest, by listing an order for 0.00000001 BTC, which will never get filled. That raises the "Buy Volume" total desire. You will see mine floating around, as I move it from coin to coin. I have a nice stock of other coins, ready to sell, when they peak, to get BTC to contribute to XHC, in the multipools.

That's for sure! Honorcoin must rise to the mythical Phoenix.

Should I submit a whitepaper about my block-chain-reducer, auto-dust-killer, Collect-or-return spends, Tagged receipt spends, network wide-distribution, anti-dominance flooded-deviation-killer and anti-stale vacancy-block-killer?

I like gold more... It'll be a goldpaper, to match the logo. Gold is the new white. White is so yesterday.

Sell you an early peak for 2-BTC. Sell you exclusive "first release rights", for 50-BTC. Otherwise I will just be vague, let everyone screw-up the concepts, again. xD

Potential securities and gains:
 - Historic through-put privacy (Not anonymity. Pure eradication of distribution-paths.)
 - Smaller block-chain size (Size reductions beyond 99% potentially, without loss of holdings or funky compression.)
 - Faster block-chain downloads (Due to smaller size, and an additional method of structure.)
 - Faster block-chain exploring and balance-checking. (Again, due to the major redundant reductions.)
 - Reduced block-sizes from the dust-killer. (Allows for more tx's to be delivered in less space.)
 - Less over-mined blocks, within a time-frame, which leads to abnormal and undesired forking and ultra-low diff-adjustments that hurt the network.
 - Less stale-blocks, ensuring that tx's are never stalled due to an unrealistic and unjustified ultra-high diff-adjustment that hurt the network.
 - Less branching and unfair rejections from slow and distant isolation of network participants.
 - Fast-block coins, without the headaches normally associated with fast-blocks, and all the advantages of fast-blocks. (Shorter delivery, and less potential invalid transactions or double-spends.)
 - Spends that MUST be collected, or they get returned to the sender. (Spender security)
 - Proof-of-purchase, with a "must accept or return" and "return to sender", tag. (For buyers and sellers)

No, I would not expect ANY of that to be implemented by the time of the new wallets release. That is just some of the results/concepts that have been the focus of my studies for the last few years. I commend those who tried to implement some of them, but the solutions they use are lacking in creativity and full of unneeded complications. Some are new, some are old, all are desired and needed for mainstream production.