I tried my best to answer this, though it seems that some of the categories are arbitrary. Maybe someone else can comment if they disagree with me.

NEM
Operational	No
Consensus Mechanism	POI
Block Production Time	60s
Recommended Confirmation Time	10 blocks
Worst Case for Confirmation Time	360 blocks
Transaction Load	2 tps
Anonymous Transactions	Future TBD
Transaction Fee Costs	Progressive
Network Security Costs	Transaction Fees
Share Supply	8.99 billion
Share Divisibility (precision)	6 decimal places
Profit Sharing	no
Market Pegged Assets	In Development
User Issued Assets	In Development
Order Matching	In Development
User Registered Accounts	In Development
Messaging	yes
Cross-Chain Trading Support	In Development
Multisignature	Yes
Smart Contracts	In Development
Hardware Wallet	In Development
Mobile Wallet	In Development
Decentralised Exchange	In Development
Pruning	In Development
Voting System	In Development
Instant Transactions	In Development
Automated Transactions	In Development
Mesh Networking	In Development
Account Control	In Developmentt
Marketplace	In Development
Brain Wallet	In Development
Alias System	In Development
Encrypted Blockchain Messaging	yes
Merchant Tools	In Development
Inflation	0%

Regarding TPS: this is still being looked into. We did extensive tests and exceeding 120 trans/block makes the blocks too big for people with poor internet connections to share with their peers easily. We may increase the number of transactions in the future based on the health of the network and usage (e.g., avg size of attached messages, etc).

This is called "priming." It's interesting that introducing bias can have a large impact on subsequent perception.

I believe ours is a mesh network. If it is multi-node to multi-node communication, it is a mesh, which is our case.

The NEM devs aren't messing around 

it's real time

NEM has 5 very well educated and very experienced core devs.  There might very well be a guru or two on the team.  Apparently building a new code from scratch and doing it well is quite a challenge.

As pretty much everyone knows, I don't know hardly anything from the technical perspective, but I talked to a programmer who independently decompiled the code and was very impressed.  

Ethereum had a massive pre-sale and so it is open source pre-launch, but pretty much only the coins with massive pre-sales are open-source pre-launch.  

That said, it is not completely locked away either.  It is possible to decompile it and have a good look.  @Eadeqa, please take a moment to decompile it and take a look.  I hope you can look at it and come back and say good things!

Any Greek NEMsters?

What you'll find there is only part of our changes, it'll all be visible, once nem.core will become public
(so that NXT will be able to borrow ed25519 if they'll want to)


We went thorugh curve25519 paper, and ed25519 paper (and bloodyrookie went through some more papers). It's math. We're NOT BAD at math.

You do realize, this is text from FORKed implementation...

Do not mix implementing OWN crypto, with porting implementation.