I'll contact Anonibet. If Anonibet or any other book can't meet the standard limit of 15 minutes for withdrawals, they will be downgraded. Some leeway will be given for large withdrawals.

Yes, that would be helpful. PM that to me and state that I have your permission to look into your account. The first email that I sent them was generic.

Its now 19 hours and counting, still nothing in regards to my withdrawal from Anonibet, I am just wondering if its only me or are there any other Anonibet customers affected?

What's Play by play? I never heard this before, any examples in fiat sportsbooks? Thanks.

DirectBet lowered from "C+" to "C"

Player placed two bets on Calgary v Vancouver NHL match on October 8, 2015. One bet was for .04 BTC and another for .2 BTC. The bet for .04 lost and the bet for .2 won.

DirectBet confiscated both bets stating:


DirectBet was asked how the player defrauded the system. DirectBet wouldn't share how the claimed fraudulent activity occurred with peepsplace or the player.

When there have been claims of abuse against other books, the book has always shared information asked of them. This is the first time that a book refused to share information disputing a claim. There is no choice other than downgrading DirectBet.


DirectBet -  feel free to reply if you would like.

I'll let one of the parties post the exact bets if they want.

DirectBet is claiming they were hacked. Not only were winnings confiscated but the deposit, amount wagered, was confiscated. I assume that this was done as a punishment.

No good book will ever confiscate your deposit.

Interface is phenomenal and very user friendly. Deposits were credited after 3 confirmations as stated on your site. Withdrawal times on 3 different withdrawals were 2 minutes, 20 minutes and 16 hours.

For the bad, there's very little liquidity even for EPL and NFL. There aren't any NCAA markets. In the NFL a ML is listed but not a spread.

I really like the site and hope that there's more liquidity in the near future.

Shoot me another PM saying that I can look into this and I'll do it. This one is an easy call.

We strive to improve BetBTC everyday. There are still things that can be better, however your D rank is unfair at the moment especially if we take in consideration that there are many books out there with settlement and withdrawal problems with C and B ranks.

All liquidity is placed by our users. We can't be liable if league x or event y "is listed but not a spread", our action towards this is only improving and promoting betbtc so that more people get in and this empty markets don't exist anymore on the future.

What we should be ranked for is about how our platform is solid and secure, how our deposits are credited in time, how our withdrawals are credited in time, how you can make a trading exactly like you do on betfair (cutting liabilities like no other do), how our events are settled in time, how we haven't lost a satoshi in more than 1 year, how we haven't had any complaint in more than 1 year, etc..

About the lack of leagues just one word, we could deploy all leagues and matches on the platform, we pay for all that already. The point is that we prefer to have only the majors for now so that the liquidity could be more concentrated. Maybe on the future if we think it will be positive we could get them back in (as we already had on the beginning).

Cheers