Are you BURST-94CV-7DGV-CTHZ-EQ7N8 ? The graph looks pretty normal to me.
Well, could be sheer luck or the absence thereof, you just have a statistical chance, no entitlement of finding a block.

What miner engine are you using ? I've had problems with the original java miner, but that was solved by restarting all instances daily. No error on "misbehaving" miners was given, I had to try a few things to find that.

Also, they don't like running in tight memory conditions, the amount of memory you need to provide seems to be directly related to the stagger in plot files. equal plots sizes with 16k and 360k stagger use 24gb vs. 8 gb on my system, IIRC - ditched all small files weeks ago.

My wallet feeding 8 instances its pretty stable, though.

That was my thought also... and considering something from my side to be an issue.

I was looking through the Burstcoin source code, and one thing that worries me about future scalability is the hard-coded MAX_NUMBER_OF_TRANSACTIONS constant, which limits the number of transactions per block to 255. This is similar to the 1 MB block size limit that is currently affecting bitcoin. Bitcoin is bound by this block size limit, and therefore the bitcoin network can only process a maximum of 7 transactions per second. Burstcoin has a similar limit right now, but its limit is 63 tx/sec. This gives Burstcoin more time to solve the problem - but since solving it requires a hard fork,  I think it would be better to solve the problem now while the coin is still young.

I think the best solution is something along the lines of Gavin Andreson's proposal to increase the maximum block size by 50% per year. I think in Burstcoin's case, the solution should be to increase the maximum number of transactions per block by 3.45% per month (which is about equal to a 50% increase per year).

This is an important change for the future scalability of Burstcoin. And it's an important change to make now, because the more the coin matures, the more difficult it will be to introduce a successful hard fork.

If you're interested, @burstcoin, I'd be willing to take a crack at coding up this change in behavior.

http://asset.cryptomining.farm/#
Asset Id:  18119229184320918134

Double checked my miners and settings, everything ok. Looks it is not up to me.

How to check wallet for ddos protection?



Another thing, it is 180 Tb not 150 (6 machines with 8x4Tb drives).
And 3 more machines on the go. Ready for a day. Total of 9 x 8 x 4 Tb in space (around 280Tb total).
Also, call me stupid, but I am not selling burst yet! I expect at least double price up.

Seriously , u are better off buying at this price , especially when BTC price is so low + Low burst price. Mining will make sense when price goes at least triple.

hash = https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/787265.msg10132987#msg10132987
solarfarm = https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/917737.msg10103885#msg10103885

please pm

nope doesnt look like it, maybe in 25 years?  

I am all for burstcoin but that asset is obvious scam or just really dumb issuer. u will never roi

if you do RIO, you will do it because burstcoin price is higher and then you are better off holding burstcoin instead of an asset.