"To do" list with could be made with the community, if dev would kindly accept to do some thing from that list.
Obviously, POD and audit are rejected by him.
He has the right to do so, but...
If not doing that, there are dozens of other things that could be done.
Let me fix this audit is never ever rejected by us. We just cant find competenet & able developers can really check what we did (multisig based trustless system) it's such an advanced technology we cant find a good dev to check. This technology never seen before in any altcoin. it's very audit-able if you check our whitepaper and we accepted to share some part of codes which maybe asked by this audit dev or we can answer him.
The only multisig product dev we can find was openBazaar and they seem to be too busy with their project. we still look for some people can check our whitepaper and some of our codes and confirm it's trustless and works.
+1
Don't let me be misunderstood. My intentions were never been disrespectful. I had the my own conclusion that our team is not doing that. I still do. No offense,please, i don't mean anything wrong, or bad.
Superteam, how is possible that nobody is competent? Crypto Cobain, Kristov Atlas, Mike Murphy (my choice for such an audit, because he's really a great crypto fan, and honest man), gmaxwell???, Mike Hearn???,Peter Todd??? Last 3 are from the Bitcoin team...
Call me uninformed, and i would even confess that myself , but isn't the Open Bazaar based on slightly different coding? How would they review us? If they are competent, @CryptoBull and others, let's literally beg them to do so. Please explain.
Finally, if nothing of that is done - it is not really a problem. Those who have done POD could put somebody else as a dev, and still to remain unknown. It's not a 100% proof method...
What really the problem is, it would be on the list today, or in a couple of days. Those are some ideas : investigating about coin issues, help members who had trouble, or put them on the pillar of shame in public, if it would be proven that they were liars.
Wallet update, with integrated conf, so that non-experienced users could install it too, and stop saying that wallet is not working (it does, but not all of us know how to install it properly). Version with the installer would be great too.
We will talk more these days.
Best regards, folks.
My English is not native one as you can see, it may seem to you sometimes rude but i try to communicate always in a good mood to my members. So when you read think positive. I am a motivator kind person. I like to excite people and sell coins ... but not always, i have bad days and good days. When i read posts i may misunderstand as well.
Open baazar dev team can know what is trustless system looks like. They can ask the right questions needed. Like "if this is trustless how you generate multisig address? What is your multisig address? How do you use escrow, guarantor show me codes from this step, where can i see the flow chart after this or that etc. " for example they have in open bazaar mixer, guarantor, escrow concepts but as a different names. But they do basically same job so it becomes trustless system in the end. If their team someone can code C & Java desktop can read the lines, it's very possible they have that kind competent dev.
So we don't need to have same coding. It's a kind of engineering stuff. We have concepts and we can understand each others. They use same engine type they drive car (marketplace) but we drive airplane (altcoin) with it. This could be another example.
we like and respect other dev teams (including Bitcoin devs) and we showed them the path going to the trustless wallet, the real simple & necessary solution for the altcoin increased anonymity without vias (TOR or coin mixer services). Bitcoin devs work for already a good coin so they might not want to take risks it can be disastrous to make changes. It's up to them in the end. Or they may have other reasons. I dont know. But its crystal clear we did not see multisig based any altcoin before us. This answers actually itself. If they could, they would already see? :-)
We don't afraid because we are new and nothing to lose and we have to innovate to be a good choice within many coins. We don't afraid because we can do. We can see & solve problems at the same time. I think we proved this many times, two fork fixes and many wallet updates.
Our wallet can be evolved in the future to simplicity. I agree more tutorials and helpful documents needed. we will see.
