Horacewoodwood
Full Member
Activity: 154
Merit: 103
https://primedice.com/?c=WINFREEBTC
|
 |
June 09, 2017, 03:44:39 PM |
|
I advise to read the book"The God Delusion; 2006 ,Book by Richard Dawkins"
Very good choice, a truly masterpiece. 'The selfish gene' is also a good read. Cause and effect show us that God is the only way this universe could happen. Dawkins is becoming a delusion the more he writes crap like this.  You said yourself that cause and effect alone can't prove God, are you losing your memory? Why do you even comeback to this thread where all your crazy ideas have been debunked already. You come here just to say the same thing now, God did it. Save yourself the trouble, you are not convincing anyone, at this point it seems like you are trying to convince yourself. I said that cause and effect combined with universal entropy combined with complex universe prove God. You aren't losing your memory on this. Why not? You never checked it out to remember it in the first place. Check it out: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.msg10718395#msg10718395https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1662153.40https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380Really quick Episode 15 from our famous retard, Badecker. Here we can observe how superficial he actually is and also how stupid he gets day by day. Astargath told him how his affirmations are contradictory regarding cause and effect and asked him if he is losing his memory. The poor idiot responds by saying he meant something else and accusing Astargath of never checking out his links in order to remember them in the first place. Three or four pages earlier, Astargath did a step by step rebuttal of those exact links to which the retard, Badecker, responded. Need anything more to say? Let's just calmly wait for Badecker's reply in order to have an episode 16 of the proof of how supernatural Badecker's stupidity is. Remember kids, don't do drugs or religion. You might end up a retard like Badecker. Perfect example of how BADecker ignores the truth and pushes his own agenda. He cant argue a single point without making assumptions or completely ignoring facts. Mr T says it best: "I pity the fool" Notice how stats can't bring any rebuttal to the proof that God exists, but he finds it easy to attempt defamation of BADecker.Wow.... talking in a 3rd person.... is that a new skill or are you tying to avoid the reality of the situation. As for rebuttal...... since you are so good at looking at links, search your own links and ye shall find. That's just another one of the things YOU aren't smart enough to do... search my links and find rebuttal in them. You lost your fuel badecker, I'm still waiting for your response to my latest post, not to mention that I already debunked all your ''proof''. Maybe it's time for you to abandon this thread and search for another because you have been destroyed here, just saying, as friendly advice. There is no reason to respond to your posts. When you talk religion like you do, you will simply believe and blab anything that you want no matter what is said. Pick a point that you have debunked, and list it and the debunking... in simple, brief language, from your own understanding. Cause and effect alone has almost proven that God exists. Almost all scientific investigation has as its goal, a way to debunk cause and effect, by finding something that is pure random. The particular scientist doing the research on a particular science project may not know that his science will be analyzed for proving cause and effect to be false, but it will. Cause and effect shows programming of everything in the universe... even so-called free will. Programming needs a Programmer. To debunk God scientifically, you will have to debunk cause and effect, entropy, complexity, or at least one of them. No, no, let's pretend you are right and what you said points to a ''creator''. The question is, how do you know who the creator is? What is your evidence or proof that it is the christian God and not aliens from another dimension or that we are living in a computer simulation? There are lots of questions. Why pick on this one? Are you setting me up to be some kind of authority? Research cause and effect, entropy, and complexity if you want authority. This is the scientific proof that God exists, thread. Ask your other questions elsewhere. Maybe even start your own topic(s). None of them point anywhere specific in terms of what made everything. You said the creator is God from the Bible and I asked you, how do you know, you don't answer, yet again. Your 4 links that you always post are supposed to show there is a creator or that something created us, fair enough, I'm pretending it's true, you still don't answer the question of how do you know what the creator actually is and how do you know he is a God and not something else. Stop avoiding the question, don't be a bitch. Why are you bringing religion into it? This is a science topic. Why do I have to answer your religious questions in a science topic? I don't. So, you stop being a bitch... can you, even? Just to please you, however, let me say that my religion is that the Creator is the God of the Bible. It seems that your religion is not that.Scientifically speaking, I don't know what the Creator really is. How can someone of the universe, who thinks according to the laws of the way the universe is and works, conceive of something that is completely outside of the universe and its laws... at least in part? Nobody is made to be able to think that way. At the same time, cause and effect, entropy, and complexity point towards that "Something" that we can't fathom, as being the Creator. The question isn't one of me not explaining. The question is one of why you won't accept the proof that is so evident, right in front of you, when it has been explained over and over to you. Episode 17 - 'The shameful fall of a retard named Badecker'. There is not much to say, as you can all read what that idiot posted. After pushing everyone aside and asking only for 'scientific' proof or disproof, after claiming that God exists because he believes that simply combining some laws might prove it, after being bossy and authoritarian to people who asked him how could he know it is God, after many other shit he has said here, Badecker comes out of the closet and admits he doesn't know it's God (assuming his theory would be correct, although it is not). He also says that 'Nobody is made to be able to think that way'. Why all that struggle then? If his God created him in such a way that he would never be able to know that God is the creator of the universe, why all the messages, the revelation, the bible, the need for belief and prayers? Does not seem like that God likes to be discovered, acknowledged or praised. Above all, how can someone who doesn't know for sure that God exists claim scientific proof for it and hang on for dear life to his theory? How can the same person be religious although he is aware he doesn't know shit about something that he calls the Creator? Why try to impose his views, be them scientific or religious on a subject that he is aware he can never know anything of? Well, we have the answer written by Badecker himself: 'Just to please you, however, let me say that my religion is that the Creator is the God of the Bible'. It's just a religious propaganda, it's his religion that pushes him to try by all means to prove they are right, even when he is out of his league, on subjects that he is not prepared for. His scientific proof has a religious purpose, a religious cause and a religious motif behind, yet Badecker asks everyone to stay scientific and not bring religion in the discussion. That is why he is stupid, he doesn't even know what he is doing, he only knows why: because he is religious. That is a very important step in our proof that Badecker is a stupid apologist. Let us all thank the apologist, he has made our work much easier. We might not even need 100 episodes for it. Stay tuned, shit is hitting the fan. |
