Very well stated, and aptly put.

Anybody who wants to dump large amounts of SDC please pm me first.

I'd be happy to pick up shares off exchange.

Damn looking good! ^^

It suck that people can be so childish that we are forced to now have a moderated thread. Oh well! Should keep news flowing a lot cleaner!

i advise everyone to read about this thread, link below

http://shadowtalk.org/topic/270/rich-list-11-21-2014

very nice points of view

distribution happens through time,  BTC has terrible distribution if you look beyond total wallets.  Its almost as poorly distributed as fiat!   With very few large players controlling huge amounts.     In this new 'alt' market I don't think any coin can get past several hundred or even a thousand wallets without a incredible amount of effort.   With SDC,  the devs obviously don't care about promoting a coin that is not finished in they're eyes.   Sure many of us investors are always hoping we get more exposure, but really we are along for the ride doing what we can to promote the coin.

SDC will achieve really healthy distribution in time,  Every-time the price rises and then a early major holder sells a pile of coins the distribution improves.   Obviously with a few number of wallets, having a good stash of coins means that whomever owns those coins knows what they are doing and they are excited about the future of SDC.  Much more excited about SDC than any of the other new coins out there that could be stealing our marketcap.   So that says something.   

Can somebody tell me why Shadow would need Ring Signature with ZeroKnowledge proof?
 
There'd be a bloat in the chain, no?


 I'm confused, especially because they didn't talk about their "how to approach ZK" - I doubt the use Zerocash, I doubt they use Zerocoin, and maybe the coin later depends on decentralized servers relaying the transactions building the system on "fake" anonymity.

No coin ever really achieve true anonymity, I really doubt that  Shadow, Monero, Anoncoin, Dark and all the others are able to do this.


I've been here since 2013 and I only - repeat - ONLY experienced that Coins/Coindevs fuck with people, no matter how holy they might seem, no matter what they have achieved/coded in the past. - Be careful here - Don't go 100% into a Coin, diversify.

 

I mostly hear positive voices when it comes to anonymous coins, its very strange to me, because mostly every "anonymous" coin is not anonymous, and the many coins that claimed to be anonymous fucked people over.

better u read the previous 10 pages, then do ur comment

this coin has nothing to do with the Zerocoin or what soever

just read, there are answers to all ur questions

when i read ur signature, u say: "Every Coin is a Shitcoin"... then there is no use of spending time to change ur mind

that is what we wait for, whitepaper and the review of code

Actually having such an unfair distribution is good for short term price increases. If they have strong hands, and they dont sell its ok. It keeps coins off the market.

However, it can deter investors. And of course what kind of long term prospects can an investor have?