~snip~
Dear sir,
Could you give me the qualification for good pr bad posts? Maybe you can give me the tools to view our posts before join your signature campaign
you can check your post quality by using this tool
http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/ how can this site qualify the messages? only looking the number of letters or words in sentences/messages?
It is indeed incapable of showing how good your quality is, even the disclaimer said it is inaccurate, but at least we can use that as reference. I actually almost suggest this method to secondstrade to fight spammers of our signature campaign, like having a minimum category on account estimator before applying, for example, people that is below "good" or "average" (IDK the whole ranking list they use) is not advised to enroll, like "even if the bot said you're not good enough, how dare you enlist here and wished people out there didn't kill you instantly?"

It might be a good method, though not without flaw. As we know, post quality is not based on how many character you use, there are a good load of example that sometimes one lined post is more than enough to answer the asked question perfectly, and thus lead the system used by account estimator rather biased. Still, it is handy to sort some people out.