Oh, I think we did more than that.  We have essentially invalided all of the science in the Bible.   - Actually, you have invalidated your own thinking.

- The universe was not created in 6 days - But you know that what you say is not necessarily true, even from your own stand point. You were not one of the people who received the word directly from God. And you weren't there. So, you don't know.
- Earth does not have a dome above it - But it appears to, and essentially does if you look at the earth and sky with your simple sight.
- Earth is not 6000 years old - Not exactly. But a little older, well under 7,000-y-o.
- Global flood 4000 years ago did not happen - Closer to 4,500 years ago - http://www.albatrus.org/english/theology/creation/biblical_age_earth.htm.
- Genetic variation is not due to a massive incest starting with Adam and Eve, - True. - it is a result of evolution over millions of years - False, because probability math shows that there was no evolution, and the idea of millions of years is intentional falsity by scientists.
- we have evolved from other primates, and we were not created from dirt by some spirit (I do not even know what that means) - Again, probability math shows that evolution is solidly impossible, and irreducible complexity proves it. The fact that you do not even know what something you wrote means, shows that you don't know what you are talking about, by your own admission.
- women were not created from the rib bone - The one woman that was made from a rib, was fashioned from it, not created from it.

We have explained how the universe was started, how galaxies, stars, solar system have (and are) forming.  We have found other planets in other solar systems.  We have started a project to ultimately send small nano spaceships to the closest star 4 light years away, we have detected gravitational waves, we have discovered and observed matter at the subatomic level, the list goes on... - When you look through the science fiction writer explanations of science over the last several hundred years, you will find all kinds of variation in explanations of the same things. Nothing has changed. Science law is fact. Science theory should be considered fiction until it is proven to be science law.

I think you are selectively cherry picking science like you are cherry picking your Bible. - Seems to me that you are the one who did the cherry picking in the Bible. You listed some Bible stuff. But you missed most of it.

I urge you to cherry pick science, eventually, you will understand that the Bible is a collection of Bronze Age nonsense. It is literary work.

We've done this dance notbatman.

Both the Michelson-Morley and Sagnac experiments didn't prove the presence of an aether but ironically (for you) the Sagnac effect can be used to prove that the Earth is rotating.

Fuck off, both M&M and Airy's Failure (keyword here is failure), prove the Earth is motionless. As for Sagnac's interferometer measurements at 10% of the predicted velocity of Earth's rotation and with a sidereal cycle they most certainly do not prove the Earth is rotating but that there's an aether drift.

So yes, we've done this dance before and you're still on the losing side of the argument, faggot.

[...snip...] I made a minor edit; M&M actually measured the aether drift (10% predicted velocity), I believe they used Sagnac's interferometer.[...snip...]