Now you are just trolling...
We've been over this theory vs hypothesis = fact vs guess a dozen times already... if you don't understand it, you never will
Your response is the example of a troll's response. Why? All you do is say that I am trolling, but you don't give a logical explanation of of why something I say is trolling.
The real proof that yo are the troll is, I show you the proof that God exists, and you can't show where I am scientifically wrong in the proof. All that is left for you is to troll, since you don't like the "God" idea, but can't refute it.
I gave a logical response... you keep denying reality... you keep saying that a scientific theory is just a guess, and not based in fact... which is a false statement
I provided links to sources the first dozen times I refuted your claim... shall we go for
#13?
From
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theory?s=t, still the same as the last time I provided it:
theory
[thee-uh-ree, theer-ee]
noun, plural theories.
1. a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena:
Einstein's theory of relativity.
Synonyms: principle, law, doctrine.
...
Notice the word "propositions" in #1.
Did you notice the words, coherent,
tested and
correct?
What about the synonyms, principle,
law, doctrine?
Theory might be law. It is not known to be law, except that it matches the law of what a theory is.
Law is always law, never theory.
No questionability in law. But theory is always questionable.
Perhaps some day you will understand...
Theory and law are 2 different categories of things...
A hypothesis becomes a law when it is proven via mathematics
A hypothesis becomes a theory when it is confirmed via induction, makes accurate predictions of future events, withstands peer review, and is accepted by the scientific community as fact, truth, and an accurate representation of reality
A law can never become a theory and a theory can never become a law...
You are saying the equivalent of, "When this cat gets older it becomes a dog"
Correct. A theory can never become a law. It either is a law or it isn't. The fact that it is a theory shows that scientists don't know for a fact whether or not it is a law.
However, regarding some theories, scientists DO prove that they are laws, at which point they declare that they are laws. They prove other theories to not be law, at which point those theories are dropped from even being theories, or they are modified to the point where they again become questionable, both positively and negatively.
Thus, a theory is a tool. A law can be a tool as well, like the three laws that I have used to prove that God exists.
I rather hope that few Christians figure out that God exists by looking at the three laws that prove His existence. Why? Because their faith in the things that God says is strengthened more by believing the witnesses in the Bible.
If you don't have faith in what God says, you insult Him by calling Him a liar. You endanger yourself when you do this. He just might lock you into your unbelief, thereby locking you out of Heaven
