The current political environment has taken on a different dimension. It is never possible to stay that position unless the government is supported. Although it is a cricket organization in name but money and power are given more importance than cricket. As a cricket organization which is never expected. I myself also consider it from all these aspects that it will be good for cricket if a former cricketer gets this administrative power.

The majority of people I think would like to see ex-players in administration, but on the other hand, I believe that politics in administration is inevitable and cannot be avoided in any way. The hunger for power is one of the worst parts of society, and politics is the outcome of that hunger for power. There has already been a lot of buzz about the situation with Sourov Ganguly, and I am glad that Dravid has chosen to go into the coaching department, and I think that is quite a good fit for him. In spite of the fact that the majority of people would like to see ex-players in administrative positions, it rarely happens.

As of now, ICC is surely one of the biggest joke around the sports world because of their poor management and weak policies which are creating problems for them and no one going to solve this even for the personal interest they are creating more problems here now time for having a big discussion are they serious for this game's development, or they are just going to for their own interests which are surely going to be the dark future of this game BCCI's greediness is going on their high for more stake from media rights even they are the biggest market in the world now it's time for having big heart and allow things could be fair and for the better development of this game they need to scarify few points which will surely increase funds for associate countries which will bring better results.

Here are now all boards surely need to sit and talk about this all as it's right time and for me if India is going to be fit in these policies then surely we can expect big issues in this sports organization and this game could be bigger loser in this all issue.

If China is in high position(cricket), the same could've happened with China. These countries on the top of the population makes it a big market for every business. Anything successful in these countries will generate big revenue. This is the prime reason why companies and sponsors spend big on leagues conducted on these countries.

India is a huge populous country and there are many cricket lovers who are very excited to watch their country play so when India plays most of the Indians go to the stadium to enjoy the game which is why when India plays there is a gallery full of spectators to enjoy their game.  For and the gallery filled crowd instilled a kind of confidence in India which allowed them to play very well and win most of the matches.

The India-Pakistan spat is getting very ugly now. Jay Shah (secretary of the BCCI, and president of the Asian Cricket Council) made a controversial remark that Indian team may not visit Pakistan for the 2023 Asia Cup, and asked the ACC to move the venue to a "neutral" country. The PCB has responded by saying that if India refuses to visit Pakistan for the Asia Cup, then Pakistan may skip the ODI world cup of 2023, which is hosted by India. Being an Indian, I have to say that Jay Shah's comments doesn't make any sense. He just want to divert the attention from Ganguly's sacking.

I don't think that this is an acceptable solution. Already we are down to a handful of countries in world cricket. And among these few countries, we can't afford to have boycotting and other types of drama. I can understand if India refuses to visit Pakistan for bilateral tours. But there is absolutely no justification for boycotting multi-nation tournaments. If they do that, then it will significantly weaken the Asian Cricket Council (ACC), because most of the revenues earned from the Asia Cup goes to the ACC.

Finally the World Cup venue gets changed. This is gonna happen, BCCI will stand on their decision. India being a big market for cricket is a well known truth. They're one among the powerful boards who have the ability to change the decisions of ICC. We've got more time the next Asian Cup, out of some treatie the issue will come to conclusion.

The thing is that ICC has become money-hungry. In fact, the whole cricketing world has become addicted to money flow. And I just hope that the Big 3 doesn't get revived because if that happens, the future of cricket will be compromised. Cricket is already in a tough spot right now. I think that the associate nations are not getting enough attention from ICC and that is not a very optimistic sign for the expansion of cricket. However, I'm also fearful that, if the big 3 countries try to gain the advantages they had before, they will somehow get back together and resurrect the association again- this is what I'm most worried about now.

No matter how you think of one, you'll feel that since their country is a very populous country, it's only natural that they'll have huge crowds at their games.  Because cricket is a very popular game among them and most of the people in India love the game of cricket and they prefer to enjoy the game of cricket face to face.  So you will notice that when India plays, the gallery is full of Indian spectators while there are hardly any spectators from other countries.