<<  >> (p.32)
    Author Topic: ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1  (Read 397410 times)

    • io8621
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 149
    Merit: 11


    View Profile
    May 17, 2016, 05:12:50 PM
     #621
    Ok, understand, another question genoil with stratum is incompatible with dwarfpool?
    When i try to connect with pool soft crashes.

  • Amph
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 3276
    Merit: 1072



    View Profile
    May 17, 2016, 05:33:57 PM
    Last edit: May 17, 2016, 05:48:39 PM by Amph
     #622
    with the stratum mode the hashrate displayed is less then the one with dwarf plus stratum, 1 mega less for each of my 970, there is a reason for this?

    edit, it's higher now, a little to slow to reach full hashrate...i also noticed more cpu usage in stratum mode

  • feriq2
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 53
    Merit: 0


    View Profile WWW
    May 17, 2016, 06:45:07 PM
     #623
    Hello there,

    Thank you for the new version of the miner!

    Is the number of stales I'm getting ok (46 vs 270 accepted)? I'm not using stratum but getwork. Should I try to avoid stales? If so.. how can I do that?
    http://imgur.com/WB25j25

  • Genoil (OP)
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 438
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 17, 2016, 08:35:15 PM
     #624
    Quote from: feriq2 on May 17, 2016, 06:45:07 PM
    Hello there,

    Thank you for the new version of the miner!

    Is the number of stales I'm getting ok (46 vs 270 accepted)? I'm not using stratum but getwork. Should I try to avoid stales? If so.. how can I do that?


    It's a bit high. You could try lowering --farm-recheck or try the stratum mode and see if it makes any difference. Two actual Fails there. Much overclocking and heat going on there?
    ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
    BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW

  • feriq2
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 53
    Merit: 0


    View Profile WWW
    May 17, 2016, 09:03:38 PM
    Last edit: May 17, 2016, 09:40:13 PM by feriq2
     #625
    not much overclocking tbh - 3 cards are @ stock cores but downvolted by about 0.05V. 2 of cards are overclocked about 10 percent and @ stock volts. Temps are between 60°C and 70°C and one card is about 80°C. What --farm-recheck value should do the job? What's the default --farm-recheck vaule? I'm going to try 200 Smiley

    Thanks!

  • smaxz
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 430
    Merit: 253


    VeganAcademy


    View Profile
    May 17, 2016, 09:47:40 PM
     #626
    still trying to get answers for why additional DAGs are created for some pools.. while nicehash manages to accept shares on a single DAG.

    recently i have noticed an additional dag is created in my .ethash directory even when solo mining, except its not reported to console and there is no progress % updated. although it hogs an antire core of cpu usage for the time it takes for creation.
    - NGdTwHRSdnThdi1drQuHGT3khAHRtZ1HMq -

  • skyboyextreme
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 22
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    May 18, 2016, 09:02:04 AM
     #627
    why i can't seem to download this off of github

  • Amph
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 3276
    Merit: 1072



    View Profile
    May 18, 2016, 09:46:30 AM
     #628
    genoil why with the stratum mode, the cpu increase the usage to 50% when running the miner? talking about cheap g1840, with the non-stratum the cpu usage is much lower, half of that....

  • Genoil (OP)
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 438
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 18, 2016, 10:00:55 AM
     #629
    Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2016, 09:46:30 AM
    genoil why with the stratum mode, the cpu increase the usage to 50% when running the miner? talking about cheap g1840, with the non-stratum the cpu usage is much lower, half of that....

    Are you sure it wasn't generating a DAG file while you were testing stratum? On my i5 dev box the stratum implementation actually seems to use a little less CPU. On the other hand, the stratum implementation is asynchronous multi-threaded, which your G1840 maybe doesn't really like as much as my i5 does. Perhaps I should do a synchronous stratum implementation some time.
    ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
    BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW

  • Amph
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 3276
    Merit: 1072



    View Profile
    May 18, 2016, 10:24:03 AM
     #630
    Quote from: Genoil on May 18, 2016, 10:00:55 AM
    Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2016, 09:46:30 AM
    genoil why with the stratum mode, the cpu increase the usage to 50% when running the miner? talking about cheap g1840, with the non-stratum the cpu usage is much lower, half of that....

    Are you sure it wasn't generating a DAG file while you were testing stratum? On my i5 dev box the stratum implementation actually seems to use a little less CPU. On the other hand, the stratum implementation is asynchronous multi-threaded, which your G1840 maybe doesn't really like as much as my i5 does. Perhaps I should do a synchronous stratum implementation some time.

    no it's clearly the stratum implemented thing that has something to do with it, i tried with my other i7 4790k and i noticed an increase of the cpu usage as well up to 10%, 25% on the g1840

    when i mine at dwarf pool using their stratum i'm not getting this usage, the cpu is sitting at 3% the g1840 a bit higher, but it's normal

  • skyboyextreme
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 22
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    May 18, 2016, 10:39:52 AM
     #631
    guys what is the ideal configuration for R9 290s, HD 7900s and HD 6900s

  • fr4nkthetank
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2294
    Merit: 1182


    Now the money is free, and so the people will be


    View Profile
    May 18, 2016, 01:21:27 PM
     #632
    Quote from: skyboyextreme on May 18, 2016, 09:02:04 AM
    why i can't seem to download this off of github


    yeah.......click on get raw or something on the bottom

  • DragonSlayer
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 181
    Merit: 100



    View Profile
    May 18, 2016, 08:24:13 PM
     #633
    What kind of hash rate should I expect from a gtx 980?  I think that I am going to give this a shot over at ethermine.org.  Anyone got a good bat for the pool?

    Thanks

  • MinerDudeRigs
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 6
    Merit: 0


    View Profile WWW
    May 18, 2016, 11:39:42 PM
     #634
    Thanks a lot for this miner it is my workhorse.

  • Ayers
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2954
    Merit: 1024

    Make Your Own Fortune


    View Profile
    May 19, 2016, 05:56:14 AM
     #635
    Quote from: DragonSlayer on May 18, 2016, 08:24:13 PM
    What kind of hash rate should I expect from a gtx 980?  I think that I am going to give this a shot over at ethermine.org.  Anyone got a good bat for the pool?

    Thanks

    not much, not really worth it, i think around 25 mega, better to use a 970 imho

  • Pustul
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    May 19, 2016, 12:46:03 PM
     #636
    Quote from: Genoil on May 15, 2016, 03:36:05 PM
    Quote from: Pustul on May 15, 2016, 03:27:24 PM
    Genoil, do you think the new 1080 and 1070 will hash as fast on a win10 rig as a linux or win7 one? It will be nice to get my computer back  Grin

    You mean as slow?

    Oh I read it too fast and didn't understood that it was 650 KH/s  Shocked
    Hope they fix the TLB problem before the release...

  • Genoil (OP)
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 438
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    May 19, 2016, 02:00:08 PM
     #637
    Quote from: Pustul on May 19, 2016, 12:46:03 PM
    Quote from: Genoil on May 15, 2016, 03:36:05 PM
    Quote from: Pustul on May 15, 2016, 03:27:24 PM
    Genoil, do you think the new 1080 and 1070 will hash as fast on a win10 rig as a linux or win7 one? It will be nice to get my computer back  Grin

    You mean as slow?

    Oh I read it too fast and didn't understood that it was 650 KH/s  Shocked
    Hope they fix the TLB problem before the release...

    With current Linux drivers the 1080 hashes at 23MH in OpenCL. So ~24MH I guess in CUDA. After a win10 July update, there is a chance of much higher speeds because of the 2MB page size support. But I can't promise anything Smiley
    ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
    BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW

  • Pustul
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    May 19, 2016, 02:27:49 PM
     #638
    Oh nice, thank you for the reply. I'll buy one for gaming anyway. Let's hope for the best  Wink

  • Flanalog
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    May 19, 2016, 03:01:01 PM
     #639
    Hi,

    Anybody have this problem before while compiling?

    (33%)
    /home/ethrig02/cpp-ethereum/libethash-cl/ethash_cl_miner.cpp:40:40:/home/ethrig02/cpp-ethereum/libethash-cl/ethash_cl_miner.h:12:21: fatal error: CL/cl.hpp: No such file or directory
    compilation terminated.
    libethash-cl/CMakeFiles/ethash-cl.dir/build.make:59: recipe for target 'libethash-cl/CMakeFiles/ethash-cl.dir/ethash_cl_miner.cpp.o failed

    and so on and so forth...

    it continues to compile until 69% then I get

    Makefile:116: recipe for target 'all' failed
    make: *** (all) Error 2

    Ive tried deleting everything and starting from scratch but its not helping..

    I followed the build instructions for Ubuntu here https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum

    on a side note, i had no troubles building the miner on a different rig.. what is different on this rig, no clue.
    I would greatly appreciate any help!
    Thanks in advance!

  • melloyellow
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 176
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    May 19, 2016, 03:29:13 PM
     #640
    Quote from: Genoil on May 19, 2016, 02:00:08 PM
    Quote from: Pustul on May 19, 2016, 12:46:03 PM
    Quote from: Genoil on May 15, 2016, 03:36:05 PM
    Quote from: Pustul on May 15, 2016, 03:27:24 PM
    Genoil, do you think the new 1080 and 1070 will hash as fast on a win10 rig as a linux or win7 one? It will be nice to get my computer back  Grin

    You mean as slow?

    Oh I read it too fast and didn't understood that it was 650 KH/s  Shocked
    Hope they fix the TLB problem before the release...

    With current Linux drivers the 1080 hashes at 23MH in OpenCL. So ~24MH I guess in CUDA. After a win10 July update, there is a chance of much higher speeds because of the 2MB page size support. But I can't promise anything Smiley

    Will the 2mb page size support affect amd cards?
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 90 »
      Print  
Page 31
Viewing Page: 32

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com