What will drive demand for ICN if the ICO hits 10,000+ BTC? Think about it.  The more funding raised during the ICO, the less ICN each investor receives.  At that point the only thing giving the ICN "value" will be the reluctance of investors to sell their ICN at a loss.  But why will people who didn't participate in the ICO want ICN once it hits exchanges?  The dividends.  But if ICN hits exchanges valued at, say, $1 or $2 USD a piece (a hypothetical breakeven price for investors) and it requires 5000 ICN to receive $10 worth of eth per week in dividends under the condition ICONOMI is able to generate ~$200k per week in profit... will people really be itching to buy it rather than investing in anything else out there? 

Please tell me if I'm looking at this all wrong.  It's easy for the ICONOMI team to call for ever greater funding because they have a fixed share percentage of the 100 million ICN.  Their share doesn't decrease no matter how much is invested during the ICO.  This means in 6 months, when they gain access to their shares, they'd be able to sell beneath ICO investors breakeven price (i.e. at a more reasonable price for people wanting ICN for the dividends) and still make a killing.

I'm not suggesting they would do that, but these are some thoughts bouncing around in my head and I think they're worth talking about.

These are just few examples.

Factom will definetelly be in the index as well. It has unique properties for categorisation. Has sufficient market cap and liquidity - important factors for index.

This project sounds very promising, I must admit that I think to invest however is any amount accepted, or is there any min. amount that I should invest? I am not that experienced and it will be my first investment in my life, please give me some advices .

This project sounds very promising, I must admit that I think to invest however is any amount accepted, or is there any min. amount that I should invest? I am not that experienced and it will be my first investment in my life, please give me some advices .

That means more investors, less tokens, and more value.

Yes but people are right. They have a fixed amount of shares. It should've been a percentage for the team, not a fixed amount. Yes the value per token goes up but we get less and less tokens, meaning just our initial investment amount, whether it be 10,000 at a $1 or 1 for $10,000. As the investment amount increases, all it does is slash our market growth potential and put big money into the fixed share amount that the team will receive.

Yes but people are right. They have a fixed amount of shares. It should've been a percentage for the team, not a fixed amount. Yes the value per token goes up but we get less and less tokens, meaning just our initial investment amount, whether it be 10,000 at a $1 or 1 for $10,000. As the investment amount increases, all it does is slash our market growth potential and put big money into the fixed share amount that the team will receive.

Is ICONOMI Doing Right by Its Investors?


https://medium.com/@misterystery/is-iconomi-doing-right-by-its-investors-9b489045eea5#.dr5ppmbpj

They are using the same model as other recent ICOs that have all raised more money than they expected when they started.

Funds for the dev team are not a bad thing imo, it motivates them even more to make the project work, as a big part of their pay is in the actual token that they are trying to build.

ICONOMI is looking really good to me, glad I invested some in the first week and now following. I think the cap might be reached in the final week.