Poor in my definition is something that is uneducated and not so active in the internet, there main concern is to survive and have their basic needs. I guess, only few of the poor people you mention can work with bitcoin, not all has the right knowledge as I believe when working here education is a must.

Besides, working online is not the real essence on why bitcoin is created, it's just part of the benefits but it will not last forever.

Well i do understand the most earn money just to pay bills and food, with that said if they know english, sure they can join a signature here, and i would consider buy a computer and internet an investment that they can do and get a better life, with a job they can get a loan at their banks, and with the income of signatures i do believe they can repay the loan and improve their life.

I don't think so, to help poor countries need more than just digital currency.
Poor country means people income less than standard
Bitcoin may help some people who joined the forum to get an extra income, but not an entire country.

It would  be  impossible if your aiming for the whole country because  even  on  convincing  one  people  would  be  already  hard  how  much  more  on  millions of people.  If  people would do  find  good thing   on  bitcoin he would surely  use it no matter what

Well, Bitcoin can be earned through faucets on the Internet, has zero maintaining balance, does not require a credit check, is corruption-resistant (politically and financially speaking), and can potentially grow in value over time. These aren't just "cool features." These features collectively represent the only financial services that these economic tiers could hope to be eligible for.

Cryptocurrencies know no borders, so a person in a Vietnam, for instance, can purchase some bitcoin and use it as a store of value that protects from the domestic fiat currency that is being devalued, or the Bitcoin payment network can be used to move that value abroad for investment -- something not otherwise possible today because of capital controls and/or fees causing such a cross-border transaction to be prohibitive...

Government in poor countries just help the people to stay poor, corruption and things like that... And actually bitcoin isn't good for governments at all because this can be bad for the fiat and we have the anonymous factor here.

To help the poor is a very noble cause and I made sure to yourself that what you do to others comes back to you many times over the amount. If it is even to believe that a person can truly be happy. But if you help someone, you need to know what he needs, or at least that it gets your help.

CORUPTION It is a big problem of most poor countries. Although this malicious phenomenon flourishes in other countries where there are less people's living standards. Poverty is this phenomenon not win and bitcoin is better not even think to direct for these purposes.

there is corruption in poor countries, but there is also corruption in the "rich" countries, they just disguise it better. they call it lobbying or a special fee etc. also the education in some poor countries is very good only not everybody has the possibilities to study. we need to change the way we talk about those poor countries. 

if the government adopts this course bitcoin will make corruption more definitely there will be tax evasion and so forth, so actually bitcoin is not always able to help the country in all respects