So you and Doog have 100% control, why not end this bullshit and divide the funds proportionally to the rank (as I suggested somewhere above)? You have every right to do it.
Let's not get here yet, however contracts can be voided and I personally think this is an appropriate time to void the contract
-- but there is no need:
I cannot find anything in the rules the prohibit modification or altering of the signature to add a disclaimer.
DiceBitco.in has later claimed that changing or altering it breaks the rules. However, as stated the rules do not prohibit modification. Contracts may not be altered unilaterally.
(BitcoinInformation and dooglus, please check email for longer response)
You're right, the rules doesn't state anything about alterations. But DB posted somewhere, that whoever does that, will be removed. Doog + BTCinfo seemed to take this as a legitimate instruction and chose to comply with it.
The fact is, DB broke the rules by making Doog and BTCinfo responsible for payouts (he was meant to do this, escrow was just to secure the funds and add confidence).
So again, Dooglus and Bitcoininformation have every right to close it early (not even to mention that 10BTC may not be sufficient).