I think you didn't understand what I said at all.  I'm obviously in a agreement with PRC at the moment.  I obviously agreed to terms of that agreement.  I also consider that prc is bound by that agreement and therefore I am "entitled" to the terms of that agreement which, in this case, are a payment per post.  Anyway, I don't know what you mean, saif, so I'm going to leave it at that for now

It's not about that, it's about a 2 part agreement where someone agrees to pay another person for a service. The owner of the campaign sets    - ALL - the terms, so it's not about people "demanding stuff for little work".

@PRC_May  Perhaps I interpreted your comment about "entitled" in the way that seems most relevant to me.  I apologize if I misconstrued what you were saying.


I don't exactly see that.  If someone says to me "I want to rent this space for this much money" and I agree, that seems a lot more like an agreement between individual parties than it does to an employer/employee relationship.  In any case, I apparantly am missing some of the context here, because I don't really know what you mean about "demanding stuff out of the blue".

As far as whether it's a gimmick, I don't know that I agree.  As far as I can tell, what you mean by that is that the impact is trivial.  But that doesn't seem to be the case.  At least, for your sake I hope that it's not.  I know that from my end, the litle bit of BTC I make doing these ad campaigns has eventually added up to a pretty respectable sum.  But then again, what's respectable is obviously open to interpretation.  In any case, it's certainly more than you'll make clicking on faucets for hours.  And I hope that my sponsors make a good profit from the traffic that gets brought to their websites from my posts.


Here I think I disagree entirely.  If someone is scamming, then I lost the value of the contract, which might be very little or very large depending on the rate of pay and the number of posts involved.  To be honest, this is one of the main reasons that I'm not interested in monthly campaigns.  I don't want to lose the value of a month long contract if the contractor fails to pay (as in the case of updown, recently).  I don't think it's just spoiled brats who say that they expect people to uphold their end of an agreement.


Well, I just post like I post.  I like to argue (to a point, I don't like flamewars, but I like discussion).  And by "free money" threads I think you're talking about signature campaign threads, which I definitely keep track of.

Cheers!

No, but you're saying it's wrong to claim you're entitled to getting paid for the advertising you've done, because you haven't "lost anything, except having to bear the 'unbearable' signature ad".

Gotta add that one bit though:
@Armed: Sorry if that's what you understood, that was not my intention. Of course that is okay.
Just didn't like the kind of attitude that people often put on. There could be no sig campaigns at all and people would have to sit there doing faucets for many many hours to even get close.

Just as true: there could be no sig campaigns as tall and pocket rockets casino (inter alia) would have to find other ways to try to get people to hear about their site!

Wow about the person with forehead advertizements.

You know, I always thought that computer makers, car manufacturers, tshirt makers, anyone with their logo on a product I buy should have to pay me to wear their logo.  Therefore I almost always put a sticker over my computer maker and I don't have a car anyway but if I did I'd probably pull of the car company logo.

Which is one of the reasons why the society is fucked up.

pay money to make adds....and they say humanity is evoluting