this is stated quite a bit on the forums, and i always found it especially ironic because it seems to be the case that it really is the speaker's own ignorance that is being projected...
very similar to what happened in the other thread with zanglebert. nothing against him, but you really need to inform yourself about a topic before passing judgment, or else you're no better than the people on something awful who circlejerk about how idiotic bitcoin is without ever fully understanding it.
how many assumptions you want to make? you too should inform yourself before passing judgement
i've probably read more books specifically on TA than books that you've read in total in your life
just because you can draw some arbitrary lines doesn't mean you know what you are doing. but you can remain convinced if you want.
