this comes to my mind when I see your fake WO hat:

Pulp Fiction = Decent
Reservoir Dogs = Decent.
Forest Gump = Decent
The Usual Suspects = Really Good.
Knives Out and Glass onion = Good


I can't properly judge Mary Poppins or Sound of Music as I was under ten and saw them in the movie theater first run. Same with 10 commandments.

So all of them have that young kid first impression issue.



Oh Kill Bill one and two were very good.

The use of bloodshed was very well done.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Well, I see that even from my own rendition of bottom prices, it will take until about late 2048^** or early 2049 for 0.63 BTC to get into entry-level fuck you status, which is meant to be $2 million based on today's prices (so not accounting for how much more the dollar might decrease). .. I am not sure if it is realistic, but surely getting us into a 25 years time frame for 0.63 BTC to reach firmly into entry-level fuck you status.. even though surely some folks might consider from their own circumstances (cost of living and/or standard of living expectations) that they may well be able to get by in a kind of entry-level fuck you status at much lower values.

** By the way, I did have to update that particular chart to add in the late 2048 projections that show the time upon which 0.63 crosses over into entry-level fuck you status, since the earlier version had skipped the relevant data from 2043 until 2056... maybe I should just plug in the whole data-set - since I do seem to end up referring to that chart quite a bit and surely folks are curious about those kinds of projections regarding when their quantity of expected BTC will cross into entry-level fuck you status and similar kinds of questions in that direction.

Raw numbers:
11/28/2048

$3,139,783   Expected 200-week moving average

0.63698674  Quantity of BTC to equal $2 million at 200-week MA price

It seems to me that relatively pure DCA practices would account for either cases in which:

1) you have some set dollar amount that you buy BTC at some set period whether daily, weekly or some other period

or

2) you buy based on when your money comes available, so the date and the amount would vary, but perhaps you would have a formula that allows you to figure out how much extra that you have available (accounting for monthly expenses to determine how much is left available, of course).

Surely the more that you vary either 1 or 2, then you are perhaps overly bringing your own discretion into the mix, and it still may well fit DCA depending on the extent to which you may well have some kind of a system in which you are trying to stay consistent but giving yourself some flexibility within some somewhat objective criteria.


It does not sound unusually to either plan to do such a thing or to even attempt to carry out such plans if such a dip were to take place, but I still retain a certain level of skepticism regarding how BIG of a game that people tend to talk in these regards in comparison to what they are actually able to do based on the dynamics that I already described in my earlier post.


That's what I am saying.. it is easy to talk a BIG game in this regards, but frequently it is not going to be easy to deploy or even to decide whether to stick with the plan to deploy and/or to leverage some assets or credit that you might have available (or that you can conjure up).  Even though I am saying that I am skeptical, ultimately you are the one who is going to have to make those kinds of planning and/or execution choices and figure out if you actually ended up "backing up the truck" or whatever it was that you were planning to do in order to acquire .00324864 additional BTC.   


Sure it makes sense, and you surely are the one in the best position to assess how aggressive you believe that you are able to be without somehow ending up causing too much stress upon yourself if post BTC performance does not end up living up to your expectations once you execute your relatively aggressive (from your perspective) additional BTC accumulation approach.


Who is this "we" that you are talking about?

Is the "we" in the room with you now?

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

I liked it too, but could not make sense out of why dildos? Imho, they did not fit into the story, but maybe it is just an example of the 'nonsensical' universe, just like the one with the "sausage" fingers?

Who the fuck is this moron?  Doesn't he know that I'm in charge?

hahaha can i take responsibility too?

Meanwhile, in bitcoin mining.

You Hire me you hire a Particle acclerator
😎😎😎