I don't _feel_ tardy...

Well, it looks like you already need reading glasses, since we were talking about 2062 not 2065, so hopefully you put your reminder in your calendar properly.


That's a good point.


Fair enough.


Not easy to know if he might have any BTC or not...Presumptively he has enough BTC to consider that the equivalent of 0.05882353 BTC (in other words $10k at the price of $170k) would not be any meaningful skin off his back to give those over to an internet stranger.. unless maybe you and he might happen to be the same peep?  


What do you consider to be "a lot of BTC?"

It seems to me that you may well not need as many BTC as you might think that you need, and one of the things is to get the fuck started sooner rather than later... and sure even though stacking $100 per week seems like a decently good amount right now, yet even for peeps who don't have $100 per week for stacking, the they still likely witness decently good results, especially if they might have a relatively long investment timeline that might go 20-30 years or longer...

In 2043 or 2053, you may well be quite impressed by how many BTC you have relative to people who might have delayed their BTC stacking a lot more than you... and surely there are a lot of folks in the world who are either no coiners are low coiners.. perhaps more than 99% of the world's population.


I knew that he was stealing my work (ideas).


Upon first read, I had not even noticed the " ' " direction.

You are correct Sexylizzy that this recent price bump is not really very eventful, but I think that your presumptions that it is going to go back down to the lower ends of the "don't wake me up" zone is a bit overly optimistic (or overly pessimistic?) in terms of where we are at and where we might go .. including but not limited to the ongoing UPpity potential of king daddy. 

Hopefully you are not waiting to buy more BTC at lower prices and/r that you are not sufficiently prepared for UP, in case we don't get any further down before up... but who knows.. sure this could be a fakety fake... it was ONLY a $2k pop from $26k to $28k within about 2 hours, so sure it could correct back down.. but then again. maybe it won't?


Yes.  "We" know that you sold too many below $20k and have not yet bought them back.

 


Is that a threat?


How long are you planning to be around?  a whole week? 

Maybe a month or two?


You too?

Ditto my above questions to PoolMinor... and maybe a few more, but I don't wanna be too much meanie or to appear unwelcoming prior to any possible substantive irritants coming out of your keyboard, if you know what I am talking about, willis?


That wasn't a bad clip, I must admit.. even though surely a bit of a fantasy... but looked pretty real.

price of btc at time of the original  post 25,985
price of btc less than a day later 27,705

If I make it to 105 I won't give  FUCK ABOUT THAT COIN. I will be happy to hand it over.  With simple proof of A LIVING JJG  or if not a living fillipone

Don't shoot the messenger.

I am largely just trying to repeat the idea regarding some kind of ballpark ideas for the replacement cost for that coin in 2062 as compared today which is likely going to have a pretty big difference, as I already mentioned my previous posts, as shown below.



I am not sure how many shits can be given about the 200-day moving average, but the same statement about closing higher than seems to be true in regards to the 200-week moving average too, and so I suppose that those two are coincidentally in similar places.. but still being a long-term investor, it seems to be a bunch of noise to be taking too much account for daily indicators, including ones that go out as far as 200 days.. and sure if you think about it, the 200-day moving average is more or less the same as the 30-week moving average.. yet who gives too many shits the 30 week moving average either... especially when we have the 100-week moving average and the 200-week moving average as more steady longer term indicators.. with the 200-week continuously moving up (but sometimes at a lesser slope of upwards.. which might some day have some negative periods in the slope, but not yet) and the 100-week moving average actually moving both up and down. .and so they are currently getting to a point in which they are coming closer together with the 100-week moving average starting to get below $32k.

Oh gawd....  



Each of us should aspire to be just like daddy tildah..



right?




right?









rrrrrrrrrriiiiiiigggggghhhhhhhtttttttt?

Welcome to my ignore spammer.

TRY READING THE FUCKING THREAD BEFORE POSTING YOUR TWATTER SHITLINKS.

Of course you aren't, it was meant as a semi-joke. Your correction to Jay and the apostrophe comment were the serious part. I pay attention to such details, and appreciate people noticing them.

Where is Nullius BTW? I miss him and his beautiful Greek goddesses...