https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/03/windows_10_upgrade_satellite_link/

here you go tek ^^

That is because it downloaded it over a satlink which is very costly with very limited bandwidth windows 10 did automatically download but it didn't automatically install the end user had to tell it to install with many choosing not to which is what I said

Windows update by default is set to auto download updates

Your trying to get off point now the whole thing was that keeping backwards compatibility is a good thing because not everyone wants to upgrade and shouldn't be penalized for doing so

lols you fool, more like what are you doing here 
your the one that likes to get paid to troll,

so why have you not...
joined memo 

Because I have no interest in doing so it can't be that great to say every thing is on chain the daily activity is no different now than a month ago

Plus this is bitcointalk so I come to talk about Bitcoin I don't go to bigcoincashtalk

As far as I understand, it should be fork 1: 1 to the price of bitcoin? But how is this possible? Not quite as it is understandable ... (

God knows who are those stupid people who believe roger ver is the creator of bcash along with fake Satoshi - Craig wright.. god bless the people this network is heavily centralized

BCH has been working hard on the business's acceptance, and the audience can feel the strong vision of BCH in Roger, to abandon the radicalism, but to see that the community's core figures are affirmative in doing things.

In the near future, there will be more and more projects developing applications and services on BCH. Though these projects are relatively crude, they have the advantage of centralization, so they are very likely to bloom in the future.

pretty sure you are the one who is trying to get off point.  The original point is how soft forks force/ coerce upgrades on those who did not sign up for them.


So far the advancements to the argument show concerns over SF's forcing users to choose between an ever shrinking & aging version with the hope (trust) of backwards compatibility.   So in other words ~depending on the level of trust (trust) the users have in the makers of the new soft fork to actually keep their word when their is no incentive to so do. 

What a travesty that someone able to think that backwards regarding proper economic incentive was working on bitcoin at one time and either unable to see the stupidity or actively planting this backwards thinking on purpose to destroy it.  So glad to see some break away today.  


So under tek model of sf we should trust the people doing what we do not want them to do to have our best interests before their own?  And hope that they will support the thing they did not make for ever even though they make no money off it all while they make their own project/ product that directly competes???