That game has been waited for so long. First of all before this chartbet or whatever came out with the V2 we were actually expecting something like crash betting but then it happened to be offline individual type game and that was so disappointing. Finally we are going to get the online version, I have been waiting for that to happen on stake for so long, I am pretty sure it will revive the wagered numbers a lot on stake (even though its still a lot, it does have its ups and downs) so I am pretty sure thanks to this its going to get crazy.

We will actually get to see how many people joins the game each round versus how many people join on other casinos and actually get to make a comparison showing how awesome stake is and how many more people bet here compared to other places.

I do agree that Ripple is centralized and many people do not like xrp but remember this is a gambling site. If someone has ripple he can directly deposit them in stake.com to gambling, rather than first converting them to bitcoins and then depositing. The more options of deposit the gambling site give, the better and easy it is for the gamblers.

Not only Ripple, but also any altcoins that have cheap transaction fees, and fast transaction speed might be added in gambling sites sooner or later. Because they will help both casinos and gamblers. Additionally, there are other factors such as total daily liquidity, and history of network congestion. Casinos and gamblers need as fast transactions as possible, so it will turn out to be so terrible if network congested.

It all depends on the scale of which you're considering.

Overall, the inclusion of Ripple means that you're allowing it to be used more... to propagate across the crypto ecosystem for a longer time. Even if you are not a fan of Ripple, that is what is happening. It's like if you allowed Bitconnect as an available coin to be used at Stake.

Yes... that's exactly the point I'm trying to show.

I am not a fan of Ripple or its centralized system. A platform that allows the use of it is indirectly (or directly, if you want to see it that way) increasing the adoption of the coin.
This means more usage of a coin that will end up in the palms of corruption.

We already know fiat is garbage. Why don't we know that Ripple is?

Not a fan of alts for gambling either. It WAS fun and seemed like a good idea at one time, now we all need to define digital money a lot better.

If "crypto" doesn't have a money then why would anybody buy ANYTHING involved in crypto. We believe bitcoin is that money and the altcoins drag down the value of bitcoin the longer they stink up the space and do nothing but leach peoples bitcoin.

Bag holders of Ripple probably want to dump it on gambling a lot more than they would their bitcoin....but that is the whole point. A business in the "crypto" space should WANT peoples bitcoin for goods and services. Wanting Ripple is a "questionable" business decision at best....idiotic at worst.

Stake gets credit for not being one of those "we have our own currency" gambling sites with an altcoin (how many of those do we need stealing peoples bitcoin for a useless Altcoin)

If Ripple is really for "internal bank swaps" (as it was originally sold to people as), it is probably going to be regulated at some point. The Ripple team has a coin that isn't XRP that banks actually DO use, so adding it to a gambling site seems very odd. Very very odd.

Ethereum has that fork coming up, none of these coins were originally trying to be "digital money," its just profitable for them to pretend these things are "money."

Even bitcoin is pretty useless as money...its a digital store of value at best still and we love it but the shit-coins drag it dowwwnnnn

business is business and as much as some of the owners like or dislike certain alts
if they see an open market that they are missing out on , they will not hesitate and add that coin
I understand and share actmyname's sentiment towards XRP , it is not even a proper crypto in my books
but , unfortunately , in this world money rule the world and if something is profitable and legal - it is going to be taken advantage of
in this case XRP  happened to be one of the most deposited coins ( according to the Stake's representative in this thread ) , so I guess it was a good move from the business point of view

🏏 Gary needs your help to win the upcoming ICC Cricket World Cup!
Help him out and be ready for this week's Blackjack Cricket challenge because the prize pool can go up to 0.1 BTC!
Join here: https://forum.stake.com/topic/23250-%F0%9F%8F%86-01-btc-garys-race-to-21blackjack-challenge/

I think the whole point is, there are plenty of people who think Ripple and XRP is a scam and their coin has nothing to do with the company itself and just because the company gets more deals and contracts doesn't mean the coin holders will make more money because it is not like shareholder or dividend type of deal, so xrp will be the same like it was after a deal whereas it is portrayed as when ripple has a new deal the price should go up.

It is a highly centralized and controlled coin that mostly owned by one company and can change whatever they feel like changing in the coin and that is why people dislike it. That is why it should never be in the same sentence as stake. However, I understand your position as well since XRP is top 3 in coins list for market cap and that makes it look legit.