I believe Lina.review had already some solution to this.  If you read their whitepaper, they have some qualification to be a helper.  This means helpers have guidelines to follow in reviewing certain products.  I believe that these guidelines will be their basis to qualify these helpers.  Though I wonder if these helpers will be the consumers themselves because if they are not then all their reviews will be questionable since they do not have a first hand experience on the said products which they reviewed.

Of course as consumer on this things it is our obligation to take buy on it. And it is normal to review also by the company have worked with lina project. Aside from that they have rules from this matter which we need to follow it as well, as long as we are part of their umbrella whether we are consumer or investors or common users we can become Helpers and Common users may be distributed system revenue for their review and assessment work, depending on configuration.

I see, i thought it was something different. yeah, hope they can advertise this great idea more because it's like they not getting enough attention yet, is there any updates how much they raised already ?

I do understand your sentiments, I too has a lot of quetions and I was never answered by Lina.review representative only the supporters of this campaign anwers me. Its better to hear anwers from the right door so we can be enlighted by their answers.

Yes! It is a must for a helper to become transparent to all, they must give point to each other and make a review that is fair to all in order for the people to trust again the online reviews. Helpers must be responsible and can handle two opposite sides!.
P.S.
Sometimes politician made the law for the their own purpose.

I guess these reviews can only be posted by helpers, and these helpers undergo qualifications before they can be appointed being a helper, so let us call that filtering process, and saying negative review as long as they have proof about it will never be biased and will help customers a lot and at the same time making the product owner to enhance their service and make more quality products.

But how can we be sure that the helper who made the review for "LINA.REVIEW" is not bias and just base on the truth? We can't tell if the review of the helper is paid or by all means. A company who doesn't need a review for a better rating can pay people to ruin others reputation especially if that item or establishment is a threat to the company he is managing. It is cheaper to pay some review than to make a commercial on the mainstream. This will apply to the transparency of the review and the credibility of the helpers.

How can we be sure the review for "LINA.REVIEW" is not bias and just base on the truth? Truth to be told we can't unless we ourselves use the products being reviewed and make a review ourselves. I believe that no product is perfect and as the saying goes you cannot please everyone. There is sure to be a few reviews that is contrary to the majority. What Lina.review offers based on my understanding is the transparency on who is making the review and what are his/her credential to make a review using blockchain technology. LINA is set to make a trend on review platforms with these. With the transparency we can say that people can be more confident with the reviews and buy products that are LINA reviewed so to say. LINA, i think is not geared towards giving positive reviews but honest reviews. For companies, yes it might hurt their prestige and profitability but companies who can't take criticism and improve their product might as well go out of business since we see how a VIRAL post on Facebook can make one a celebrity or an enemy of the Social media people. Similar to reviews.

1. Companies pays LINA platform for reviews
2. Qualified Helpers makes an honest review for the product and gets paid by LINA
3. Company increases Sales due to quality reviews
4. More Companies prefers using LINA platform for reviews.

These is the ideal set-up. It is bigger in reality but hey let the technical people handle that.

How could Lina.Review can tell if a certain review is not bias? If 1,000 reviews would say hey this taste goods. Very delicious and LINA people tastes the actual product and its a garbage, then we can say that the 1,000 reviews are biased or paid. What do I mean by these. Aside from expecting honest reviews, LINA could assign qualified people to at least sample the products being reviewed. These maybe helpers themselves promoted to higher rankings based on their qualification and previous reviews or LINA has their own Quality Assurance Team sort of an Audit.

LINA will be under the development stage and they can actually take our concerns and inputs here for them to review and use in the development of LINA.

I hope these helps.

I also have that questions in my mind. They require CV for the helpers to review such product or service. I hope that Lina. Review team will answers our questions so that we will be at peace to invest in this project.

They have their own reviewer and they call them helper and i believed they are required to give positive only reviews. They also have reviews from users wherein they sift very well every review they make whether it is good or not.