In short they are paying for review? Did you find the logic?
Imagine that I will give you money just to give feedback to a certain service, are you sure that you will give feedback based on your experienced or based on what will be your benefits? Practical people always find the easiest way and that is giving a positive review because they are satisfied in the payment of the review and not at the service.
Yes, it is good to see that lina will give some merits for the customers review but I am hoping that what will be the feedback of the clients are true and not be based on the incentives they will get from their review.

Dear Dev:
Please guide us in the usage of this review. A lot of them are getting confused on how does lina.review will eliminate the review fraud. I also request for the updates of this project because it seems like many people are now engaging with lina. I am also interested in lina because definitely, this will be the first to make all reviews equal and not bias for all. Somehow, I am thinking to participate at the token sale but I need more information just to proof that this project will success. It is hard to invest for nothing. Hopefully, you will see our eagerness to support your project!
Thank you.

Hi, if you have been reading this thread, you can see that LINA will be on the development stage. This is actually a promotional on what LINA is all about. Mainly LINA is a review platform. A way to for Helpers to earn by providing honest review. I've also mentioned before that LINA should have its own Team to sample or test the products under review. What LINA offers is the use of block chain technology in making the review, making it traceable to its source. Secondly, Helpers will need to submit their CV or resume and provide their qualification in making reviews. This may not be enough measure but I think LINA is open for suggestion at this point in time. If LINA will be a trusted review platform, LINA reviewed products will tend to be more competitive and consumers choice. Bottom line I think is the user's point of view. Aside from LINA Helpers, users can also provide their own review. To determine how true? Well they need to use the products themselves. Good luck.

I do Agree that its not that expensive. Although it may not be similar to other Companies who offers at a lower price during ICO, we can see that LINA do believe in their product. You know your worth even at the beginning. If you believe that LINA platform will be successful $1 a piece is good. We can see how $1 token will be worth tens of thousand in the future. Good luck to us.

It could be reliable if that is their standard and if they will screen the review and the reviewer as well. This project can be successful if they will cover all the loopholes before they open the project to public.

We all know that they are not the only review platform in existence or going to exist i dont know i didnt see their roadmap yet but i only wish they are going to make a difference from those existing paid review platform because if not, reviews will not be as effective anymore as it should be in the future. The credibility of the reviews will be stained just because everybody knows that positive reviews can be bought and negative ones can be paid to be removed.

That is the point but the question is, are those reviewers which they call “helpers” did really used the products they are going to review or yes this could be possible because both products/services are registered in the platform but what about how many helpers do they have that could be enough to give review in all companies who register to the platform to buy a review? Each helper can review only once i’m not sure for every product or sevices unless they also make dummy accounts for additional reviews  . That would be wild to think like this but it could happen.

Lina.Review is listed on CryptoStills

• Full project presentation
• Full media linking
• Continuous Twitter news updates
• Moderated discussions

lemme see how is the ground make things good and nice on this?
i am now judging you, dude! but what is your foundation of saying this project is cool and good?
have you read the white paper? if not how did you get into that? have you read all the comments here? this thing is full of doubt! i am telling you!