<<  >> (p.46)
    Author Topic: [ANN] Lina.Review | Community-Driven Review Platform | TGE Event 15th Jan  (Read 23735 times)

    • miss.M
    Member
    **
    Offline

    Activity: 171
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 08:20:17 AM
     #901
    Quote from: magz on March 23, 2018, 07:53:25 AM
    Quote from: xamil on March 23, 2018, 04:52:59 AM
    Quote from: monaydanda on March 22, 2018, 06:13:42 PM
    Quote from: xamil on March 22, 2018, 08:51:38 AM
    Quote from: monaydanda on March 22, 2018, 02:49:43 AM
    Quote from: Andycalum on March 21, 2018, 04:14:08 PM
    Quote from: Citriney on March 21, 2018, 09:02:54 AM
    Quote from: micahyahel10 on February 15, 2018, 01:52:52 PM
    The reviews of the consumers play a significant role in the success of Lina Review.  It says here that the reviews will be coming from the Helpers wHich is also known as Experts.  You will not be called an Expert for no valid reasons.  Therefore, the users upon checking reviews of the products or services will be rest assured that reviews given are qualified and reliable.

    In additional to this, I think nobody will ever give their best effort to be qualified as helper just to waste their time and destroy their own reputation.Lina Review encourages helpers to have quality, trusted and reliable reviews.
    That's in the most cases but I do think that some helpers will be biased on a side or another, making the review lacking in some aspects.
    Totally agreeable even if they do a well explained and honest review they can be certainly biased on the product or against it.  Its on their own volition if they will do such a thing just to endanger their helper title because once they are caught cheating or involved in a paid review by lina's dev and team I'm surely they will kick him out.
    Is there any chances to make this happen in lina.Review? surely at first before they hired a reviewer they need to check the background of it and make sure that they are devoted in the company where they belong.

    There's two way on becoming a helper in their platform one is being hired by the lina's dev and team, Then a common user with a quality reviews can be promoted into a helper too. Even if they are devoted in the platform I think it can still be bribe and corrupt once big money is involved on their deal.
    maybe not all reviewers is like that, although we can't culpable those person in terms of money they become monster and do things that against to the company, but there are also reviewer who are willing to gave all their best for the sake of all customers.

    I agree. There are still reviewers who are true to their job and won't let their reviews be influenced by those cheaters in return for money. No matter how much money is involved.
    For sure, lina review will filter all helpers so that the fake reviewer will  not exist in their company so that they won't give a disgrace the name of lina.Review.

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
     #902
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
     #903
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
     #904
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
     #905
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
     #906
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
     #907
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
     #908
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
     #909
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
     #910
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
     #911
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:01:30 AM
     #912
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.
    They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved?

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:04:26 AM
     #913
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:01:30 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.
    They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved?
    A white paper is just a proposal. They did their research and come up with what they think is the best for this project. I think what's on their mind  is the ability to moderate the reviews so that the review site would be a good environment.

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:05:29 AM
     #914
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:04:26 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:01:30 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.
    They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved?
    A white paper is just a proposal. They did their research and come up with what they think is the best for this project. I think what's on their mind  is the ability to moderate the reviews so that the review site would be a good environment.
    What if someone makes an honest review and it does not get approved? That would be unfair!

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:08:45 AM
     #915
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:05:29 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:04:26 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:01:30 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.
    They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved?
    A white paper is just a proposal. They did their research and come up with what they think is the best for this project. I think what's on their mind  is the ability to moderate the reviews so that the review site would be a good environment.
    What if someone makes an honest review and it does not get approved? That would be unfair!
    Honest review might not be a good review. Lina is creating new standards in the review industry, so someone shouldn't just be honest or simply share their opinion. It should be matching the new standards of lina review.

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:13:35 AM
     #916
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:08:45 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:05:29 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:04:26 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:01:30 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.
    They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved?
    A white paper is just a proposal. They did their research and come up with what they think is the best for this project. I think what's on their mind  is the ability to moderate the reviews so that the review site would be a good environment.
    What if someone makes an honest review and it does not get approved? That would be unfair!
    Honest review might not be a good review. Lina is creating new standards in the review industry, so someone shouldn't just be honest or simply share their opinion. It should be matching the new standards of lina review.
    The standardization that I read on the wp only involves adding specific criteria for a subject. That is basic and sort of mandatory part of the site since it would be included in the part you fill out when submitting a review. What if it still doesn't get approved?

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:17:05 AM
     #917
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:13:35 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:08:45 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:05:29 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:04:26 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:01:30 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.
    They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved?
    A white paper is just a proposal. They did their research and come up with what they think is the best for this project. I think what's on their mind  is the ability to moderate the reviews so that the review site would be a good environment.
    What if someone makes an honest review and it does not get approved? That would be unfair!
    Honest review might not be a good review. Lina is creating new standards in the review industry, so someone shouldn't just be honest or simply share their opinion. It should be matching the new standards of lina review.
    The standardization that I read on the wp only involves adding specific criteria for a subject. That is basic and sort of mandatory part of the site since it would be included in the part you fill out when submitting a review. What if it still doesn't get approved?
    That might be a part to be improved since they did not write anything about that. The common resolution to that is the ability to reverse it or to be able to follow up on a review if it's not approved.

  • Ganerch
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline

    Activity: 180
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:18:18 AM
     #918
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.

    Anything is possible to happened like bribing and all I can say is I trust lina.review because they have presented their company well and I believe that they have word of honor to us, investors of this project. Fake reviews are everywhere that's why they came up to this idea of a review site that is credible and transparent I hope that can attest to that. All we can do is wait and see how they work!

  • jlaw007
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 4


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:21:22 AM
     #919
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:17:05 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:13:35 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:08:45 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:05:29 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:04:26 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:01:30 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.
    They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved?
    A white paper is just a proposal. They did their research and come up with what they think is the best for this project. I think what's on their mind  is the ability to moderate the reviews so that the review site would be a good environment.
    What if someone makes an honest review and it does not get approved? That would be unfair!
    Honest review might not be a good review. Lina is creating new standards in the review industry, so someone shouldn't just be honest or simply share their opinion. It should be matching the new standards of lina review.
    The standardization that I read on the wp only involves adding specific criteria for a subject. That is basic and sort of mandatory part of the site since it would be included in the part you fill out when submitting a review. What if it still doesn't get approved?
    That might be a part to be improved since they did not write anything about that. The common resolution to that is the ability to reverse it or to be able to follow up on a review if it's not approved.
    The wp stated that reputation management is done by hiding bad reviews, resulting in users losing trust and the system losing credibility. Them doing that would make them the same as others since they will have control over the approval of reviews and control over the result. It gives them the ability to hide bad reviews.

  • chess888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline

    Activity: 224
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 23, 2018, 11:24:13 AM
     #920
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:21:22 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:17:05 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:13:35 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:08:45 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:05:29 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 11:04:26 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 11:01:30 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:59:48 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:52:11 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:49:54 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:47:59 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:45:38 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:43:16 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:41:33 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:39:39 AM
    Quote from: chess888 on March 23, 2018, 10:37:16 AM
    Quote from: jlaw007 on March 23, 2018, 10:34:43 AM
    Quote from: Elel on March 22, 2018, 08:01:44 PM
    Quote from: santiPOGI on March 22, 2018, 07:06:44 PM
    Quote from: logabe on March 22, 2018, 04:14:46 PM
    Quote from: Jadeite on March 22, 2018, 03:01:55 PM
    "7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
    approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
    If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?

    Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review.

    Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company?
    well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews.
    there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money.
    I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility.
    Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it?
    What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers?
    They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews.
    But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent?
    It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic.
    That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen.

    Quote
    review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers.

    They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved.

    That is what is implied by "could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved?

    Quote
    Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
    private blockchain.
    7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
    Lina Core private blockchain.
    The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced.

    So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score?
    Quote
    This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
    reward sharing flows:

    This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval.
    They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved?
    A white paper is just a proposal. They did their research and come up with what they think is the best for this project. I think what's on their mind  is the ability to moderate the reviews so that the review site would be a good environment.
    What if someone makes an honest review and it does not get approved? That would be unfair!
    Honest review might not be a good review. Lina is creating new standards in the review industry, so someone shouldn't just be honest or simply share their opinion. It should be matching the new standards of lina review.
    The standardization that I read on the wp only involves adding specific criteria for a subject. That is basic and sort of mandatory part of the site since it would be included in the part you fill out when submitting a review. What if it still doesn't get approved?
    That might be a part to be improved since they did not write anything about that. The common resolution to that is the ability to reverse it or to be able to follow up on a review if it's not approved.
    The wp stated that reputation management is done by hiding bad reviews, resulting in users losing trust and the system losing credibility. Them doing that would make them the same as others since they will have control over the approval of reviews and control over the result. It gives them the ability to hide bad reviews.
    I agree on the part that they should not hide bad reviews but some reviews might be of low quality, or spam? Should all reviews be approved, then?
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 »
      Print  
Page 45
Viewing Page: 46

IRLBTC™ © 2026 IRLBTC.com