Overall, this is a well thought of project. Reading the whitepaper, it was very well researched and conceptualized. Only a few holes to be filled in once it has been launched.Decentralized, competitors listed, advantage over competitors listed, problem to be solved is clear, no claims of doing the impossible, but rather thinking first what would be the best option to solve problems with the current industry. Then, there is the target client market and target user market, all other industries, and all individual users.

It should be well polished before it will be released to the public,because there will always be people who will take advantages using the system's holes.
Lets hear something about the moderator or the developers,so we would have more information about this project.

But overall i think thils will benefit most of the advertisers,because it will be much easier for them to connect to those targeted consumers.

If this project is going to achieve success it can eliminate those paid websites like techradar - cellphones and laptops reviews who are surely getting paid with the good reviews they are giving to these brands,we should know how these reviews will be trasparent and accurate reviews so the products,and consumers will benefit.

If in reality, currently there is no evaluation mechanism for reviewers tbemselves,what is LINA's evaluation mechanism for the reviewers to make LINA review reliable?

I think even if the helpers put negative review about the product and they are telling the truth then they should be given tokens. If this happens people will get more reliability to this project.

They will improve it that's why the community is here to check the downside and what we can add up to their platform. And it is really an interesting project because even if you are just a reviewer or a simply a helper to the site you can gain profits by getting LINA.review tokens.

That will not be Lina’s task in my opinion since Lina is only responsible for the reviews whether it be positive or negative but i believe negative reviews has to be accompanied by a clear explanation on how they gave the product or merchant a very low or negative rate and based on those rate they can make their services better if the costumer or helpers make bad review about them and it should not be considered as a hindrance for their success.

This will be a great source of reviews if the the blockchain technology would be use to this awesome project,i have read the whitepaper and it seems that will be possible,a decentralized review website to eliminate these paid website reviews.

Looks promising project to me,i have read the whitepaper but the question is how will these helpers or experts will earn money from giving good reviews? how those reviews will be transparent ? there are so much questions in my mind because this is something new,i couldnt disagree that we need to have something like this because those existing review websites are getting paid to have good reviews.