Guys before deciding we need to "go and change" the behaviour of forging we need to properly understand how it currently works so although it's nice that lots of people have creative ideas what would be more helpful is statistical analysis and modelling.
Quote from: bitcoinpaul on Today at 12:20:42 PM
Quote from: igmaca on Today at 12:11:23 PM
Confusing words. Do you propose something like this?
Quote from: bitcoinpaul on Today at 10:20:07 AM
Instead of leasing forge power, you commit with your account to share fees among others in the same "share fee group" if you forge a node. You still have to try to forge a block on your own, but you commit to share the incentive with others if you are successful. ... Could this be done with AT and would that make sense?
right (I'm sorry but I'm not a native speaker of English)
I do not know how you can implement technically but that's the idea
this means;
Extremely decentralized network (in the exemple 30.000 Nodes)
Small accounts motivated to participate in forging (In the exemple 100 Nxt account is forging every day)
You just have to solve for the fees to be sufficiently attractive.
An interesting idea is to pay for other things like leased computing power
I'm not a programmer
someone can model this idea?