Serious concerns and HUGE issues about Darkcoin:
. Why didn't the dev stop and make a new coin after the instamine?
. Why would anyone,group, or company use a coin with a name like Darkcoin?
. Can't Darkcoin masternodes be centralized by a group?
. Can't Darkcoin's masternodes "anonymity" be undone if one were to own the majority of masternodes?
. Isn't Darkcoin just a Litecoin fork?
. Didn't Darkcoin start off only with Linux wallets at launch?
. Didn't Darkcoin creators an a few friends instamine Darkcoin 50% with 500 coins per block in the first 24 hours?
. Don't the devs own 50% of Darkcoins right now, or over 2million Darkcoins from the instamine?
. Isn't Darkcoin's coinjoin method Not anonymous?
. Why use Darkcoin when there are coins that are already anonymous?
. Is Darkcoin being pumped/dumped by a set group of whales, who are also the ones keeping the price afloat whenever a dump happens?
. Can't Darkcoin's masternodes be compromised by hackers, since the IP addresses and locations of such nodes are public?
. Can't the 1000 darkcoin's needed for a masternode be stolen, as it already has been as reported from 1 individual before?
. Isn't Darkcoin just another pump and dump coin?
. Isn't Darkcoin's x11 algo just as easy to make ASIC's for as scrypt was?
. Isn't Darkcoin's x11 algo very inefficient as it only takes up 50% of a GPU miner's power, which also results in less hashrate and less coins being found?
. and 10000000x more issues with Darkcoin.
I agree with you completely. Evan Duffield may or may not be honest, but he is defenitely NOT a specialist, NOT a new Satoshi Nakamoto.
But how do you think why people do still beleive in him?
